<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007: Year of the Wiki OR Year of the Mashup?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/2007-year-of-the-wiki-or-year-of-the-mashup/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/2007-year-of-the-wiki-or-year-of-the-mashup</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:50:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tmdowling</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/2007-year-of-the-wiki-or-year-of-the-mashup/comment-page-#comment-11962</link>
		<dc:creator>tmdowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11962</guid>
		<description>Probably both, for the same reasons - people can &quot;roll their own&quot;.  While the big-name wikis are getting a lot of attention, a visit to wikimatrix.org will show you how many varieties there are.  And most of the lesser-known ones are part of the open-source movement, with very active user/developer communities.  My business partner and I help small businesses and local non-profits take advantage of the user-friendliness of the PmWiki flavor to create and manage their own websites that are conventional-looking to the public, but secretly &#039;intranet-like&#039; wikis for their owners and participants.  It&#039;s great fun to empower folks with this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably both, for the same reasons &#8211; people can &#8220;roll their own&#8221;.  While the big-name wikis are getting a lot of attention, a visit to wikimatrix.org will show you how many varieties there are.  And most of the lesser-known ones are part of the open-source movement, with very active user/developer communities.  My business partner and I help small businesses and local non-profits take advantage of the user-friendliness of the PmWiki flavor to create and manage their own websites that are conventional-looking to the public, but secretly &#8216;intranet-like&#8217; wikis for their owners and participants.  It&#8217;s great fun to empower folks with this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim McAlpin2</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/2007-year-of-the-wiki-or-year-of-the-mashup/comment-page-#comment-11963</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim McAlpin2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11963</guid>
		<description>neither will &quot;win&quot; as wikis and mashups are two totally different things serving different purposes. both will have substantial growth, until everyone has had one or two...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neither will &#8220;win&#8221; as wikis and mashups are two totally different things serving different purposes. both will have substantial growth, until everyone has had one or two&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/2007-year-of-the-wiki-or-year-of-the-mashup/comment-page-#comment-11964</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11964</guid>
		<description>It will be interesting to see how this evolve.

About &quot;mashups&quot;, I admit I am not too excited about them. Wikis have much more substance.

Not differently than you, one problem I see with wikis is that they require a certain amount of time and technical skills to make sense of. Of course, it&#039;s realistic to expect them to improve as more non-tech uses for them are found.

During 2007 there could be opportunities and abundant motivation for brand new models.

I am betting on one (still a prototype): 

http://www.glorum.com 

We exchanged a few emails about an early prototype for it in August (I remember CenterNetworks was brand new, too. Great job).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see how this evolve.</p>
<p>About &#8220;mashups&#8221;, I admit I am not too excited about them. Wikis have much more substance.</p>
<p>Not differently than you, one problem I see with wikis is that they require a certain amount of time and technical skills to make sense of. Of course, it&#8217;s realistic to expect them to improve as more non-tech uses for them are found.</p>
<p>During 2007 there could be opportunities and abundant motivation for brand new models.</p>
<p>I am betting on one (still a prototype): </p>
<p><a href="http://www.glorum.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.glorum.com</a> </p>
<p>We exchanged a few emails about an early prototype for it in August (I remember CenterNetworks was brand new, too. Great job).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
