<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Apple iPhone 4 Game Changers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:27:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: duke</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers#comment-191773</link>
		<dc:creator>duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=18153#comment-191773</guid>
		<description>Facebook app syncs with your address book, I think it has done this for awhile. I don&#039;t use Twitter but I imagine it could sync with your address book to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook app syncs with your address book, I think it has done this for awhile. I don&#8217;t use Twitter but I imagine it could sync with your address book to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers#comment-191708</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=18153#comment-191708</guid>
		<description>My first thought after watching the WWDC keynote address was, &#039;every mobile platform should be nervous.&#039;  Apple continues to innovate new technologies, or take old technologies to the next level.  All I&#039;ve ever seen from the other mobile companies is very good copying.  After Apple&#039;s original iphone, we saw many companies poring through the iphone tech specs to figure out how to copy the iphone.  And it has continued to date.  No ingenuity, no innovation, just overt copying.  My suggestion is to stop copying, and brainstorm something new.  

I am an Apple fan.  However, I am a bigger fan of ingenuity and innovation.  I think the mobile platform marketplace should be a place of competition.  Not one where Apple is leading and inventing, and everyone else is copying.  I would love to see a marketplace where companies went head to head, each creating their own new technologies.  Thus giving us, the consumer, a legitimate choice between two technologies, not one technology and its copies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first thought after watching the WWDC keynote address was, &#8216;every mobile platform should be nervous.&#8217;  Apple continues to innovate new technologies, or take old technologies to the next level.  All I&#8217;ve ever seen from the other mobile companies is very good copying.  After Apple&#8217;s original iphone, we saw many companies poring through the iphone tech specs to figure out how to copy the iphone.  And it has continued to date.  No ingenuity, no innovation, just overt copying.  My suggestion is to stop copying, and brainstorm something new.  </p>
<p>I am an Apple fan.  However, I am a bigger fan of ingenuity and innovation.  I think the mobile platform marketplace should be a place of competition.  Not one where Apple is leading and inventing, and everyone else is copying.  I would love to see a marketplace where companies went head to head, each creating their own new technologies.  Thus giving us, the consumer, a legitimate choice between two technologies, not one technology and its copies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pk de cville</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers#comment-191534</link>
		<dc:creator>pk de cville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=18153#comment-191534</guid>
		<description>Agree w/ most of what you say, but I think you&#039;re a bit too pessimistic about time to market.

Apple spent 2 years on developing the iPhone. The copiers need only 3 months for a physical look-alike, and 9 months for a good Android copy.

BUT, that&#039;s copying the device in hand; they&#039;ll need three years of hard, loss leader work to match the ecosystem; in fact, it&#039;s probable that no one will match the ecosystem, marketing, retail, and combativeness of Apple. Not on this planet.

I think Apple will dominate all of mobile computing by 2013: 30% of the revenue, 60% of the profit.

2013 market cap: $700mm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree w/ most of what you say, but I think you&#8217;re a bit too pessimistic about time to market.</p>
<p>Apple spent 2 years on developing the iPhone. The copiers need only 3 months for a physical look-alike, and 9 months for a good Android copy.</p>
<p>BUT, that&#8217;s copying the device in hand; they&#8217;ll need three years of hard, loss leader work to match the ecosystem; in fact, it&#8217;s probable that no one will match the ecosystem, marketing, retail, and combativeness of Apple. Not on this planet.</p>
<p>I think Apple will dominate all of mobile computing by 2013: 30% of the revenue, 60% of the profit.</p>
<p>2013 market cap: $700mm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers#comment-191505</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=18153#comment-191505</guid>
		<description>Just to be  clear, my comment is squarely aimed at that Riley above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be  clear, my comment is squarely aimed at that Riley above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers#comment-191502</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=18153#comment-191502</guid>
		<description>What a stupid ignorant racist hillbilly redneck. You do know that the iPhone is made in China? So does that mean your beloved American Apple is taking away American jobs and giving them to the Asians? Sheesh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a stupid ignorant racist hillbilly redneck. You do know that the iPhone is made in China? So does that mean your beloved American Apple is taking away American jobs and giving them to the Asians? Sheesh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Hirschman</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers#comment-191499</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Hirschman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=18153#comment-191499</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that this is likely; if it is, HTC is out of business. HTC has enough patents such that they&#039;ll both probably enter into a cross-licensing arrangement down the road, and the matter will be settled.

HTC agreed to &quot;license&quot; Microsoft&#039;s patents, but I&#039;d guess that the fee was more quid pro quo - Microsoft would offer up their patent portfolio (and get a PR win), and HTC would agree to actually produce Windows-based phones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that this is likely; if it is, HTC is out of business. HTC has enough patents such that they&#8217;ll both probably enter into a cross-licensing arrangement down the road, and the matter will be settled.</p>
<p>HTC agreed to &#8220;license&#8221; Microsoft&#8217;s patents, but I&#8217;d guess that the fee was more quid pro quo &#8211; Microsoft would offer up their patent portfolio (and get a PR win), and HTC would agree to actually produce Windows-based phones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers#comment-191488</link>
		<dc:creator>David Moon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=18153#comment-191488</guid>
		<description>I have a general rule that companies that don&#039;t worry about their competitors - particularly powerful and well-funded ones - don&#039;t stay around long.  Apple certainly worried about Google&#039;s ad presence and now Google needs to really think about how to counter this play by Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a general rule that companies that don&#8217;t worry about their competitors &#8211; particularly powerful and well-funded ones &#8211; don&#8217;t stay around long.  Apple certainly worried about Google&#8217;s ad presence and now Google needs to really think about how to counter this play by Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m0</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers#comment-191486</link>
		<dc:creator>m0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=18153#comment-191486</guid>
		<description>I lol&#039;d at your comment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lol&#8217;d at your comment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Hirschman</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers#comment-191470</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Hirschman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=18153#comment-191470</guid>
		<description>ken1w,

Point well taken regarding what the actual DPI of what some display devices may be. On the other hand, if desktops go multitouch, the users will be in greater proximity. In any case, I think everyone is going to want a &quot;retina display&quot; on their device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ken1w,</p>
<p>Point well taken regarding what the actual DPI of what some display devices may be. On the other hand, if desktops go multitouch, the users will be in greater proximity. In any case, I think everyone is going to want a &#8220;retina display&#8221; on their device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicely put</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers#comment-191468</link>
		<dc:creator>nicely put</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=18153#comment-191468</guid>
		<description>Keep in mind the 300+dpi lcd technology has been in development for 1-2 years at least now. It will take a year or two more before the ipad can be given the same treatment, but when it does it&#039;s game over for the e-ink people, and might be lights out for the pixel qi folks as well (it all depends on whether or not their tech can reach comparable pixel densities in time).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind the 300+dpi lcd technology has been in development for 1-2 years at least now. It will take a year or two more before the ipad can be given the same treatment, but when it does it&#8217;s game over for the e-ink people, and might be lights out for the pixel qi folks as well (it all depends on whether or not their tech can reach comparable pixel densities in time).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers#comment-191402</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=18153#comment-191402</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see any hardware excellence in iPhone. 960x640 resolution might be better on 4-5&quot; screen. On 3.5&quot; you won&#039;t see the difference. 

On software side, iPhone doesn&#039;t have widgets and FaceBook/Twitter sync with address book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any hardware excellence in iPhone. 960&#215;640 resolution might be better on 4-5&#8243; screen. On 3.5&#8243; you won&#8217;t see the difference. </p>
<p>On software side, iPhone doesn&#8217;t have widgets and FaceBook/Twitter sync with address book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers#comment-191400</link>
		<dc:creator>Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=18153#comment-191400</guid>
		<description>HTC will soon be paying Apple for every device it sells. I don&#039;t support Asian companies ripping off American companies ingenuity, but Google does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HTC will soon be paying Apple for every device it sells. I don&#8217;t support Asian companies ripping off American companies ingenuity, but Google does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim James</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers#comment-191375</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 08:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=18153#comment-191375</guid>
		<description>This comment -- $60mm in presold ads for 2H2010? That’s insane. For comparison, that’s more than a year’s ad revenue for SiriusXM....    What a crappy and irrelevant comparison.  I mean really, WTF?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comment &#8212; $60mm in presold ads for 2H2010? That’s insane. For comparison, that’s more than a year’s ad revenue for SiriusXM&#8230;.    What a crappy and irrelevant comparison.  I mean really, WTF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken1w</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers#comment-191354</link>
		<dc:creator>ken1w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 06:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=18153#comment-191354</guid>
		<description>I like your point about why ATT is being so &quot;generous&quot; with the upgrade policy.  It makes sense that they are highly motivated to lock in users for another two years, if there is going to be an end to their iPhone exclusivity soon.  

I don&#039;t agree about 300 DPI becoming the new &quot;standard&quot; for all types of displays.  The iPhone screen, like a laser-printed page, is meant to be held about 12 inches from the eyes when viewed.  A typical distance for a computer screen is about twice that distance (or more).  Therefore about 160 DPI would be equivalent to the new iPhones 326 DPI, at computer screen distance.  The 27-inch iMac is already at about 110 DPI. It would be a waste to make a desktop display with 300 DPI pixel density.  Laptops screen are often used a bit closer, so they may need to get up to about 200 DPI to have the same effect.  The point is to make individual pixels indistinguishable, and the needed density of pixels depends on the distance from eyes to screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your point about why ATT is being so &#8220;generous&#8221; with the upgrade policy.  It makes sense that they are highly motivated to lock in users for another two years, if there is going to be an end to their iPhone exclusivity soon.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree about 300 DPI becoming the new &#8220;standard&#8221; for all types of displays.  The iPhone screen, like a laser-printed page, is meant to be held about 12 inches from the eyes when viewed.  A typical distance for a computer screen is about twice that distance (or more).  Therefore about 160 DPI would be equivalent to the new iPhones 326 DPI, at computer screen distance.  The 27-inch iMac is already at about 110 DPI. It would be a waste to make a desktop display with 300 DPI pixel density.  Laptops screen are often used a bit closer, so they may need to get up to about 200 DPI to have the same effect.  The point is to make individual pixels indistinguishable, and the needed density of pixels depends on the distance from eyes to screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cak</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/apple-iphone-4-game-changers#comment-191350</link>
		<dc:creator>cak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 05:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=18153#comment-191350</guid>
		<description>A better 5mp camera is worth a lot more than the cheap 8mp cameras they put in HTC. Bigger screens are only so good, they also mean bigger phones. This is a personal issue, everyone has their sweet spot. And HTC are yet to address the battery problems, unlike Apple.

There are some great HTC phones, and android has come a long way very quickly. Still, for now, I think the iPhone 4 is the best phone on the market, or will be when it is released. Who knows, HTC seem to be releasing a phone a month, maybe they will have something better soon, but bigger screens, more camera MP is not going to cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A better 5mp camera is worth a lot more than the cheap 8mp cameras they put in HTC. Bigger screens are only so good, they also mean bigger phones. This is a personal issue, everyone has their sweet spot. And HTC are yet to address the battery problems, unlike Apple.</p>
<p>There are some great HTC phones, and android has come a long way very quickly. Still, for now, I think the iPhone 4 is the best phone on the market, or will be when it is released. Who knows, HTC seem to be releasing a phone a month, maybe they will have something better soon, but bigger screens, more camera MP is not going to cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 487/488 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.centernetworks.com @ 2012-02-12 20:26:11 -->
