<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compete Reports Fastest Moving Sites 2006-2007 &#8212; Are the Numbers Correct?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/compete-reports-fastest-growth-in-2007/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/compete-reports-fastest-growth-in-2007</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:50:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bannister</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/compete-reports-fastest-growth-in-2007/comment-page-#comment-14459</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bannister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14459</guid>
		<description>Well, either way we&#039;re happy to be on the list, but at the end of the day, all of the aggregated statistics sites/services (Compete, Alexa, Comscore, whatever) are going to be very inaccurate at the low-end and get more accurate the larger the site is.  If you compare the services you&#039;ll see pretty huge swings in differences, as so much of it comes down to their methodology for counting and measurement.  

Even at the scale we&#039;re at now, Compete is about 10-15% off actual numbers, but that isn&#039;t so bad - our 2006 number is off by 100%.  So based on our numbers we&#039;re up over 4,000% by visits.

But like I said, either way it&#039;s great to be on the list!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, either way we&#8217;re happy to be on the list, but at the end of the day, all of the aggregated statistics sites/services (Compete, Alexa, Comscore, whatever) are going to be very inaccurate at the low-end and get more accurate the larger the site is.  If you compare the services you&#8217;ll see pretty huge swings in differences, as so much of it comes down to their methodology for counting and measurement.  </p>
<p>Even at the scale we&#8217;re at now, Compete is about 10-15% off actual numbers, but that isn&#8217;t so bad &#8211; our 2006 number is off by 100%.  So based on our numbers we&#8217;re up over 4,000% by visits.</p>
<p>But like I said, either way it&#8217;s great to be on the list!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
