<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Death of a metric: Page Views&#8230; Born 2006&#8230; Interaction-based Metrics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/death-of-page-views/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/death-of-page-views</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:50:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted Rheingold</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/death-of-page-views/comment-page-#comment-11440</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Rheingold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11440</guid>
		<description>Page views ain&#039;t dead until the advertising agencies say so. And everyone we talk with is all about CPM no matter how we slice the presence.

I agree new metrics are needed, but I think Steve is about 3 years off and give the advertisers 5 years before they are weened off page views forever. Think about the sites they advertise on. CNN, ESPN, Yahoo, MSN, CNET, AOL etc. They&#039;re page-based sites and will be for years. Web2.0 sites hardly have advertising and the ones that get it will be the ones that get with the CPM program. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Page views ain&#8217;t dead until the advertising agencies say so. And everyone we talk with is all about CPM no matter how we slice the presence.</p>
<p>I agree new metrics are needed, but I think Steve is about 3 years off and give the advertisers 5 years before they are weened off page views forever. Think about the sites they advertise on. CNN, ESPN, Yahoo, MSN, CNET, AOL etc. They&#8217;re page-based sites and will be for years. Web2.0 sites hardly have advertising and the ones that get it will be the ones that get with the CPM program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: centernetworks</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/death-of-page-views/comment-page-#comment-11444</link>
		<dc:creator>centernetworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11444</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ted, I am not sure I agree with you. I think advertising agencies use the metrics they are handed, and sites like the ones you mention are moving towards mobile, rss, etc. and those don&#039;t work with pageviews.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do agree about CPM models for advertising and those will be more difficult to change. But the metrics must start the fire I believe.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Check out my new post about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.centernetworks.com/interactionmetrics-part-i&quot;&gt;Interaction Metrics&lt;/a&gt; for more thoughts - I posted it yesterday.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted, I am not sure I agree with you. I think advertising agencies use the metrics they are handed, and sites like the ones you mention are moving towards mobile, rss, etc. and those don&#39;t work with pageviews.</p>
<p>I do agree about CPM models for advertising and those will be more difficult to change. But the metrics must start the fire I believe.</p>
<p>Check out my new post about <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/interactionmetrics-part-i">Interaction Metrics</a> for more thoughts &#8211; I posted it yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
