<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What About A Multi-Blogger DEMO Review/Coverage Site?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/demo-conference-reviews/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/demo-conference-reviews</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:50:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: centernetworks</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/demo-conference-reviews/comment-page-#comment-15504</link>
		<dc:creator>centernetworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15504</guid>
		<description>the book will hit shelves later this year :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the book will hit shelves later this year :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antje wilsch</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/demo-conference-reviews/comment-page-#comment-16186</link>
		<dc:creator>antje wilsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-16186</guid>
		<description>that would be the best Allen, but we know you are too polite to tell us what you *really* think of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that would be the best Allen, but we know you are too polite to tell us what you *really* think of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rizzn</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/demo-conference-reviews/comment-page-#comment-16479</link>
		<dc:creator>rizzn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-16479</guid>
		<description>but it may be a little too soon to pull this off. most of the bossmen for the major blogs are all flitting about from city to city during the travel season.  MA is in Europe, Pete&#039;s running back and forth between LA and SFO.  MacManus is traveling places, I know, but not sure where.

Those are just the flight plans I know about.

It might be a good thing to work on for next year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but it may be a little too soon to pull this off. most of the bossmen for the major blogs are all flitting about from city to city during the travel season.  MA is in Europe, Pete&#8217;s running back and forth between LA and SFO.  MacManus is traveling places, I know, but not sure where.</p>
<p>Those are just the flight plans I know about.</p>
<p>It might be a good thing to work on for next year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svetlana Gladkova</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/demo-conference-reviews/comment-page-#comment-16483</link>
		<dc:creator>Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-16483</guid>
		<description>Allen, this is an excellent idea but I hardly believe it is possible to implement it this year - maybe next year on a special domain with a number of tech bloggers invited to participate. You are very right - we get so many pitches and even the multi-author blogs can not manage to cover all the startups presenting on Demo.
I have idea that we can easily implement: we could create a special Google group and add all the links to our reviews in this group. And all the bloggers that are willing to participate (after all, it is not only about us getting our readers to read our reviews, the readers would benefit from being able to easier read everything they want without having to go and look for reviews on many blogs) could publish a special post on every blog involved linking to the reviews added to this Google group to create a full picture of the coverage. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allen, this is an excellent idea but I hardly believe it is possible to implement it this year &#8211; maybe next year on a special domain with a number of tech bloggers invited to participate. You are very right &#8211; we get so many pitches and even the multi-author blogs can not manage to cover all the startups presenting on Demo.<br />
I have idea that we can easily implement: we could create a special Google group and add all the links to our reviews in this group. And all the bloggers that are willing to participate (after all, it is not only about us getting our readers to read our reviews, the readers would benefit from being able to easier read everything they want without having to go and look for reviews on many blogs) could publish a special post on every blog involved linking to the reviews added to this Google group to create a full picture of the coverage. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/demo-conference-reviews/comment-page-#comment-16603</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-16603</guid>
		<description>Sounds good as long as there&#039;s no Duncan Riley and any RWW writer is barred from reviewing anything they can twist into a &#039;semantic&#039; startup with open attention data silos or an exposed social graph.

Frankly, if you and Rizzn wrote it and covered a 15-20, I&#039;d read it. But so many writers are either just bad or have such a preoccupation with their made-up buzzwords it can be nearly unreadable.

Not saying you guys don&#039;t have your own style, but your writing does not become a caricature of itself the more you read. Yeah, Rizzn takes the cheap shots at the Dems, but I like that.

You guys just do it, and get Rafe on board, he&#039;s another non-annoyer. Man, you put that together I&#039;ll read the whole thing twice and click on an ad to boot.

All joking aside, I think it&#039;s a sweet idea. I&#039;m probably not the core audience anyway, and I can always just read the parts that don&#039;t make me want to gouge my eyes out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good as long as there&#8217;s no Duncan Riley and any RWW writer is barred from reviewing anything they can twist into a &#8217;semantic&#8217; startup with open attention data silos or an exposed social graph.</p>
<p>Frankly, if you and Rizzn wrote it and covered a 15-20, I&#8217;d read it. But so many writers are either just bad or have such a preoccupation with their made-up buzzwords it can be nearly unreadable.</p>
<p>Not saying you guys don&#8217;t have your own style, but your writing does not become a caricature of itself the more you read. Yeah, Rizzn takes the cheap shots at the Dems, but I like that.</p>
<p>You guys just do it, and get Rafe on board, he&#8217;s another non-annoyer. Man, you put that together I&#8217;ll read the whole thing twice and click on an ad to boot.</p>
<p>All joking aside, I think it&#8217;s a sweet idea. I&#8217;m probably not the core audience anyway, and I can always just read the parts that don&#8217;t make me want to gouge my eyes out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: centernetworks</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/demo-conference-reviews/comment-page-#comment-16604</link>
		<dc:creator>centernetworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-16604</guid>
		<description>yea for next time - would be pretty cool i think
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea for next time &#8211; would be pretty cool i think</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: centernetworks</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/demo-conference-reviews/comment-page-#comment-16605</link>
		<dc:creator>centernetworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-16605</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately I can&#039;t speak about the pros and cons of any other blogger - that would be wrong :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately I can&#8217;t speak about the pros and cons of any other blogger &#8211; that would be wrong :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
