Newest Content
Latest NYC Coverage
NY Web Tech Directory
Most Popular Content
Freshly Baked Jobs
Press Releases
New Interviews
Recent comments
- Re: Amtrak's Express 2107 Microblogging Express Service (video)
2 hours 31 min ago - Re: Amtrak's Express 2107 Microblogging Express Service (video)
3 hours 29 min ago - Re: Amtrak's Express 2107 Microblogging Express Service (video)
3 hours 45 min ago - Re: Photo Sharing Site Photwo Goes Up For Auction
8 hours 5 min ago - Re: Photo Sharing Site Photwo Goes Up For Auction
9 hours 30 min ago
Your Chances Of Not Getting On Digg's Frontpage Today: 98.88%
Last night during the first Digg Townhall, we learned that there are an average of 10,000 stories submitted to Digg daily. I pulled out a scratchpad today and while my numbers might vary a bit from you home gamers, the data is very interesting indeed.
Based on the math in my original article about which categories hit Digg the most along with Richard MacManus' post about which sites hit Digg the most in the tech category along with additional research outside of the tech category, here are my findings. Approximately 150 stories make Digg's frontpage per day, not including stories that make it but are subsquently buried.
On an average weekday, you have a 150 in 10,000 chance that your submission will hit the frontpage. However we need to remove a piece of your chance because we know that some sites (in Tech for example: Gizmodo, Engadget, NYT, Techcrunch, Lifehacker, Ars Technica) will get more than one a day on average. Using the completed research and MacManus' figures, I peg these special sites at 25% of the daily average which leaves the rest of us with the balance 112 out of 10,000 chance. I am being very conservative here with the power sites, the number is probably a bit higher.
When we pull out the HP 10B with these revised figures, your chance is now 1.12%; or in other words, a 98% chance you won't make the Digg frontpage today.
If these percentages continue to get worse for the average site or average Digg user to see a benefit, will there be a slow exit out of the service? Why should a Digg'er push and push if the chances are slim to none that a story will make it? Would it make more sense to target Reddit or Mixx where there are more chances to get at least some bit of traffic?
My suggestion for Digg is to create separate verticals which would allow 150 stories in each category to hit the frontpage of that vertical each day. For example, I have no interest in Politics so why do I need to see it? I know that I can turn it off but it still counts into the stories that make the frontpage. These verticals (subdomains perhaps) could allow Digg to once again embrace the community and actually grow their userbase.
For all of the startups who bank on Digg for growth (you know who you are), this should be yet another wakeup call that no blog or social news site alone can make or break your product or service.
note: not all categories have the same weighting for frontpage status and power digg submitters can up your chance by a small percentage.











I don't read most of digg stories to be honest, but I do run down the headlines almost daily. I would *love* to be able to filter crap out I don't care about...
If you did the formula factoring that you're a Lifestyle blogger/site like Health, Fashion, Food, Parenting, Home making etc then the chances you get on Digg front page are like the odds of marrying a celebrity. It could happen... like in the movies.
Allen:
Great ideas in your post but I really get the feeling that Jay and Kevin have just become very apathetic when it comes to their site. I think they have an attitude of, "it is what it is" and don't plan on making any changes. Sure, they want to change the search so that it actually works but other than that I don't see anything happening.
You're right though that we should be able to customize the number of front page stories we see but that would put an even greater strain on their servers. With the money they must be bringing in, I'm shocked that we haven't seen a server upgrade recently. The site is almost unbearable at times so I'd love to see that fixed.
Great post though...
As long as the Digg core user base is what it is, I don't see the powers that be at Digg going out of their way to accommodate a better algorithm. I don't even check Digg for the stuff I write at Profy, FreeAccess Australia and Blorge anymore, though Diggs are always appreciated as acknowledgment that someone liked my article - I get better results when people submit my work to Reddit, Stumble or Mixx.