Comments on: Digg Town Hall Quick Recap http://www.centernetworks.com/digg-town-hall-recap Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:45:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Bob Caswell http://www.centernetworks.com/digg-town-hall-recap/comment-page-#comment-16763 Bob Caswell Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-16763 I found it interesting that they did admit to having a blacklist of sites that is matched with the upcoming queue in an automated process. But then, don't worry, there's no "auto-bury." Well, I guess it's how you define auto-bury. To me, that sounds an awful lot like what I would consider to be "auto-bury." But then, all they had to say is "fighting spam" and all is well. The crowd is appeased even if plenty of legitimate sites are auto-buried / blacklisted in the process. Plus there was a quick nod to the "our hands are tied" excuse toward the end in reference to the fact that sometimes the digg crowd gets together and decides it hates certain sites/blogs. Too bad for those sites; they're not welcome by however many of the tens of millions of uniques it takes for the sites to be blacklisted/auto-buried (I'm guessing probably somewhere around .00001% of the community can decide what is permanently not wanted by everyone). To recap, legitimate sites can be (and have been, just not Engadget or Ars Technica, of course) blacklisted / banned / auto-buried (pick your term) because they're a) mistaken as spam or b) rejected a couple times by an extremely small percentage of the community. I found it interesting that they did admit to having a blacklist of sites that is matched with the upcoming queue in an automated process. But then, don’t worry, there’s no “auto-bury.” Well, I guess it’s how you define auto-bury. To me, that sounds an awful lot like what I would consider to be “auto-bury.”

But then, all they had to say is “fighting spam” and all is well. The crowd is appeased even if plenty of legitimate sites are auto-buried / blacklisted in the process.

Plus there was a quick nod to the “our hands are tied” excuse toward the end in reference to the fact that sometimes the digg crowd gets together and decides it hates certain sites/blogs. Too bad for those sites; they’re not welcome by however many of the tens of millions of uniques it takes for the sites to be blacklisted/auto-buried (I’m guessing probably somewhere around .00001% of the community can decide what is permanently not wanted by everyone).

To recap, legitimate sites can be (and have been, just not Engadget or Ars Technica, of course) blacklisted / banned / auto-buried (pick your term) because they’re a) mistaken as spam or b) rejected a couple times by an extremely small percentage of the community.

]]> By: Darren http://www.centernetworks.com/digg-town-hall-recap/comment-page-#comment-17025 Darren Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-17025 I bet those numbers will get publishers looking to find another site where its easier to get a front page submission. I can't see it being worth posting to digg. however with those numbers a clever number cruncher could work out the odds on getting a post to the front page of digg. They are fairly long odds. I bet those numbers will get publishers looking to find another site where its easier to get a front page submission. I can’t see it being worth posting to digg.

however with those numbers a clever number cruncher could work out the odds on getting a post to the front page of digg. They are fairly long odds.

]]>