Drop.io Launches Realtime File Sharing; Should Paid Upgrades Be Their Focus?

dropioLate last week I was contacted by Drop.io co-founder Sam Lessin to check out their newest launch. Today their updated file sharing platform went live — you can read about the updates on ArsTechnica and on the Drop.io blog. The basic idea is that files you upload are available to people you’ve shared the "file drop" with instantly along with the ability to chat on any file drop.

As I was sitting in the barber chair this morning reading the various posts on the launch, one thing appeared to be missing from every post. The missing piece in all of the posts is that Drop.io’s business model is based on upgrades. For drop.io, more drops is really meaningless except for a stat to share with the media. The key is getting people to either pay to upgrade the size of their file drops or get companies into their "manager" program which is also fee-based.

I am curious as to whether today’s updates will push people into either paid option listed above. The more I thought about it on the subway, I couldn’t find a solution that pointed to yes. The new features will certainly be used which is great for overall system usage.

When you offer a freemium model, the key should always be to push users into the paid options. Conversion is of utmost importance. Unlike most services, Drop.io isn’t showing ads to their free users making those accounts completely free of revenue.

I am sure that Sam has a plan with regards to pushing people into upgrades that will generate revenue for the company. I am sharing my thoughts here because getting users moved into paid plans is a question I am often asked. I continue to believe that if you are offering a freemium model, you need to offer as little as possible to keep people using the service for free while always trying to push them to upgrade. At the same time, you should always give your free customers a taste of what’s available behind the pay wall.

RSS Feed
RSS
3 COMMENTS
  1. sam lessin says:

    allen, thanks for the post – interesting perspective…

    we very much believe in the ‘freemium’ approach – but not sure that the key is to offer as little as possible for ‘free’ and put as much behind a paywal as possible. I think that limits your ultimate scope and leaves room for people to come in with inferior product and under-cut you.

    Rather, generally speaking, I think you have to model the cost of providing each given services when deciding what should/should not be premium. When we offer things for free, we do so because the marginal cost of serving them how we think they will be used is low. When we charge for things, it is generally because the marginal cost of providing them is high.

    anyway… that is our general approach.

  2. centernetworks says:

    I think you are forgetting that even if you charge nothing, others can still come into the market.

    I believe what you launched today could have been offered as a premium – while I am not sure if there is a market demand for the offering, putting out there for free will make it very difficult to monetize in the future.

    Also, the actual cost isn’t as important as the perceived value. Something might cost you nothing to build but could be perceived as something that the user will pay for. I’ve seen this countless times over my years.

  3. Faye B. says:

    It will be interesting to see where file sharing and file storage sites such as drop.io and http://www.myotherdrive.com go in the future. You’re right about getting the premium users converted being the important spot. I noticed that http://www.myotherdrive.com now has online backup offering with the file sharing so it looks like they’re working on ways to move people over still.

Leave a Reply

Become a sponsor

SPONSORS

Loop11
Clicky Web Analytics
CloudContacts
125px
Future of Web Design
Advertise here

STARTUP NEWS

twitter