CATEGORIES
- NYC COVERAGE
- WEB STARTUPS
- WEB NEWS
- CONFERENCES
- WEB TECH JOBS
- VENTURE CAPITAL
- MICROSOFT
- INTERVIEWS
- ADVERTISING
- VIDEO
- ALL TOPICS
- ALL COMPANIES
CONTRIBUTORS
- ADRIAN CHAN
- ALICIA NAVARRO
- ALLEN STERN
- CORSIN CAMICHEL
- DRAMA 2.0
- DARREN HERMAN
- HANK WILLIAMS
- MARK DAVIS
- RICK TUROCZY
- SANFORD DICKERT
- SHANNON CLARK
- Comment on YouTube Down by DVS01
- Comment on Twitter COO Costolo: Advertising Coming To Twitter Soon by Satoshi Nakajima
- Comment on Twitter COO Costolo: Advertising Coming To Twitter Soon by OMG Stop the Web! Twitter is gonna run ads ? and Scoble says you?ll love it
- Comment on What?s Up With Yahoo Mail Delivery? by MJ
An Experiment with Facebook Flyers Pro
It’s been a month since Facebook (somewhat-quietly) launched their Facebook Flyers Pro program, but the blogosphere has just woken up and started asking "is this the new Google Adwords killer"?
Probably not in it’s current state.
Facebook Flyers Pro is significantly different from Facebook Flyers Basic. It allows you to bid on a pay per click basis – as opposed to paying for impressions ($10 per 5000). The old model (impressions) has not been very profitable for advertisers.
The new system – Facebook Flyers Pro allows you to bid per click and micro-target a very specific demographic. Want to reach 18-24 year old women who are into knitting? You can. It even shows you the number of people in the system matching your criteria.
You can choose a combination of:
- country and/or city (especially good if you want to reach an international market)
- sex
- age
- political view
- relationship status
- education status (with the ability to drill down further)
- workplace
- keywords
At first glance it’s a marketer’s dream, assuming you have something good to market.
In an effort to keep their system clean Facebook has forbidden bottom-feeder ads that have become the bread and butter of Myspace – no "shoot the rapping monkey" or "get an iPhone for clicking this button" types of ads are allowed.
Here is a list of things you’re not allowed to advertise (from their TOS):
- ATF (alcohol, tobacco, firearms)
- Gambling
- Ringtones
- Software downloads – freeware, or shareware
- Pharmaceuticals
- Adult friend finders or dating sites with a sexual emphasis
- Web cams or surveillance equipment (No X10 cams)
- Web-based non-accredited colleges that offer degrees (No Phoenix or Devry)
- Politically religious agendas, hate speech, or inflammatory religious content
- Political content that exploits political agendas or uses "hot button" political issues (bad news for FOX News?)
I commend Facebook for filtering out these highly-profitable, yet trust-eroding offers.
Facebook Flyers Pro is currently capped at a budget of $50 per day, which precludes large advertisers from using it. Probably a smart move by Facebook – it’s a decent way to test CPC quietly, without pissing off their ad partner Microsoft.
The big question still remains – "can Facebook monetize its traffic?" Google was built on targeting intent. If someone types in "mountain bike prices", an advertiser can take advantage of that intent – the searcher is probably in a buying state of mind and a good target for ads. On Facebook, however, if a person has "mountain biking" listed as an interest, this does not mean that they are in the market to buy anything.
Facebook Flyers Pro still looks like it would be best suited for a brand push ad strategy – although a much cheaper one since there’s an extra step of clicking the ad – an intent-differentiator that will keep costs under control for the advertiser.
I’ve run a few Facebook flyer ads in the last few days targeting a few different affiliate niches, and the click-through rate has been extremely low. I doubt it’s the "Adwords Killer" that many people have dubbed it. However, keep your eye on Facebook’s evolving ad strategy – Flyers pro is Facebook’s first attempt at CPC and I am sure it will evolve as they gather more market feedback.
For now, I don’t think anyone knows for certain whether or not Facebook will be able to monetize its traffic enough to live up to its astronomic valuation.
Markus Urban is a guest contributor from Sarasota, FL. His AU Interactive blog covers online trends, marketing, and development topics. He’s also involved with photography blog DigitalPhoto, which covers photography tips and techniques.







When you say low CTR, what are you guys averagine?
We’re getting less than %1. Heck, less than 0.5% which is absolutely abysmal. So I don’t know if it’s the flyer (our first) or the system in general.
This type of targeting is going to be big. Same thing that MySpace announced months ago (there was a big piece on it in the New York Times, just do a search for “MySpace and mining for gold” should find it). Big brother and corporate social networks coming at ya. That’s why we are starting something independent, for people who care about their privacy. Cheers, chrisco
We, at Youlicit (http://www.youlicit.com), experimented with the Facebook Flyers Pro product for a period of a week and discussed our results here: http://youlicit.wordpress.com/2007/10/04/facebook-flyers-experiment/
Take a look and share your thoughts.
Nihaar
http://www.youlicit.com
If you could get 1%, you’d be a rockstar. I’m seeing 0.05% which is typical from what I hear.
Here are a some examples: 0.019% and 0.047%
If this was to be any succesful, you’d have to have sheer volume.
According to some leaked statistics (mentioned in months prior on numerous sites) facebook’s advertisers are seeing 0.4% AVERAGE CTR. I’d love for them to go public right now and watch the stock plummet on news of their shitty revenues (maybe $100m for fiscal ‘07?) and exceptionally high PE ratio relative to the BS valuation of $15B that everyone has been lauding them for.
I’ve been running some tests with Facebook Flyers, the results of which you can see here…
You should see the CTRs!!
http://itsanonlineworld.blogspot.com/2007/10/case-study-facebook-flyers-part-2.html
mcrilf