<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is a PR/Legal Mess in Store for Facebook fbFund?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/facebook-fbfund-emails/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/facebook-fbfund-emails</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:50:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Tremblay</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/facebook-fbfund-emails/comment-page-#comment-13202</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13202</guid>
		<description>NB: my blog is dusty. That this item received a total of 2 comments (including mine) evidences how sterile the blogosphere has become. IMNSHO, of course.

You ask &quot;What protections do app developers have in this process?&quot;. And sanj (the only other comment) asks, &quot;How is this different from any other VC?&quot;

To their credit, FB staff made it abundanlyt clear: &quot;we accept no obligations (whether of confidentiality, payment or otherwise) with respect to any materials, information or
ideas included in your submission.&quot; Hardly a clause I&#039;d accept from a VC!

In other words they could take an idea and run with it as they chose, your having accepted the &quot;no obligations&quot; caveat.

Those who already have end up getting more; those who haven&#039;t *shrug* ... to my mind it&#039;s just the raw reality of each against all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NB: my blog is dusty. That this item received a total of 2 comments (including mine) evidences how sterile the blogosphere has become. IMNSHO, of course.</p>
<p>You ask &#8220;What protections do app developers have in this process?&#8221;. And sanj (the only other comment) asks, &#8220;How is this different from any other VC?&#8221;</p>
<p>To their credit, FB staff made it abundanlyt clear: &#8220;we accept no obligations (whether of confidentiality, payment or otherwise) with respect to any materials, information or<br />
ideas included in your submission.&#8221; Hardly a clause I&#8217;d accept from a VC!</p>
<p>In other words they could take an idea and run with it as they chose, your having accepted the &#8220;no obligations&#8221; caveat.</p>
<p>Those who already have end up getting more; those who haven&#8217;t *shrug* &#8230; to my mind it&#8217;s just the raw reality of each against all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanj</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/facebook-fbfund-emails/comment-page-#comment-14023</link>
		<dc:creator>sanj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14023</guid>
		<description>How exactly is this any different than how VCs would act?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How exactly is this any different than how VCs would act?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanjay Vakil</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/facebook-fbfund-emails/comment-page-#comment-15406</link>
		<dc:creator>sanjay Vakil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15406</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hardly a clause I&#039;d accept from a VC!&quot;

Have you dealt with VC&#039;s?

Those are exactly the terms you&#039;re offered:

http://www.venturehacks.com/articles/plans-ndas-traction

“Because of the large number of business plans… that we review, and the similarity of many such plans… we cannot accept responsibility for protecting against misuse or disclosure of any confidential or proprietary information…”

— Sequoia Capital

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hardly a clause I&#8217;d accept from a VC!&#8221;</p>
<p>Have you dealt with VC&#8217;s?</p>
<p>Those are exactly the terms you&#8217;re offered:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.venturehacks.com/articles/plans-ndas-traction" rel="nofollow">http://www.venturehacks.com/articles/plans-ndas-traction</a></p>
<p>“Because of the large number of business plans… that we review, and the similarity of many such plans… we cannot accept responsibility for protecting against misuse or disclosure of any confidential or proprietary information…”</p>
<p>— Sequoia Capital</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
