<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefly Launches Publicly; Still Cute But Useless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/firefly-live-chat-bubbles/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/firefly-live-chat-bubbles</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:34:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kafka</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/firefly-live-chat-bubbles/comment-page-#comment-18062</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18062</guid>
		<description>Hey Allen. Think you misinterpreted. Or I wasn&#039;t clear. I&#039;ve always thought Firefly was cool. Or could be, at least. The &quot;feature/not a service&quot; comment is a description of the business prospects -- unless they can get many publishers to pay for this, this won&#039;t be a standalone business. But you can say that for many of the Betaworks projects, and they seem quite fine with that. Looks like they either intend to flip them after proving the concept, or make them more valuable by layering the projects on top of each other/integrating them somehow.
In any case, neat stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Allen. Think you misinterpreted. Or I wasn&#8217;t clear. I&#8217;ve always thought Firefly was cool. Or could be, at least. The &#8220;feature/not a service&#8221; comment is a description of the business prospects &#8212; unless they can get many publishers to pay for this, this won&#8217;t be a standalone business. But you can say that for many of the Betaworks projects, and they seem quite fine with that. Looks like they either intend to flip them after proving the concept, or make them more valuable by layering the projects on top of each other/integrating them somehow.<br />
In any case, neat stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/firefly-live-chat-bubbles/comment-page-#comment-18306</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18306</guid>
		<description>you put that crap on cn and i am never coming back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you put that crap on cn and i am never coming back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/firefly-live-chat-bubbles/comment-page-#comment-18552</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18552</guid>
		<description>Kind of douchy post title, esp considering you&#039;re wrong. Ever heard of something called Campfire? Similar service/function/whatever, but pretty darn popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of douchy post title, esp considering you&#8217;re wrong. Ever heard of something called Campfire? Similar service/function/whatever, but pretty darn popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: centernetworks</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/firefly-live-chat-bubbles/comment-page-#comment-18553</link>
		<dc:creator>centernetworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18553</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification Peter!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification Peter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
