<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unfortunately We Were Right Regarding Flux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/flux-comscore-analytics-reporting/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/flux-comscore-analytics-reporting</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:27:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ex-TechCrunch-Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/flux-comscore-analytics-reporting#comment-16679</link>
		<dc:creator>Ex-TechCrunch-Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-16679</guid>
		<description>Arrington said: &quot;The January spike in the comScore data was a little suspicious, so we asked comScore to double-check that it was right.&quot;

Typical Arrington BS.  If they thought it was suspicious why didn&#039;t they investigate it BEFORE posting the story?  Yes, TechCrunch has atrociously low standards for so-called &quot;reporting,&quot; but you&#039;d still think Arrington would be more cautious than to look like a total fool.  

Another example of why I moved to CenterNetworks for startup news.  Allen, you&#039;re a responsible blogger, and I appreciate that.  TechCrunch only cares about getting it first, not getting it right.  They&#039;re increasingly becoming a tabloid joke.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arrington said: &#8220;The January spike in the comScore data was a little suspicious, so we asked comScore to double-check that it was right.&#8221;</p>
<p>Typical Arrington BS.  If they thought it was suspicious why didn&#8217;t they investigate it BEFORE posting the story?  Yes, TechCrunch has atrociously low standards for so-called &#8220;reporting,&#8221; but you&#8217;d still think Arrington would be more cautious than to look like a total fool.  </p>
<p>Another example of why I moved to CenterNetworks for startup news.  Allen, you&#8217;re a responsible blogger, and I appreciate that.  TechCrunch only cares about getting it first, not getting it right.  They&#8217;re increasingly becoming a tabloid joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 333/334 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.centernetworks.com @ 2012-02-13 00:32:50 -->
