<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friendfeed Adds RSS Stats Tracking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/friendfeed-adds-rss-stats-tracking/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/friendfeed-adds-rss-stats-tracking</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:27:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ Kohn</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/friendfeed-adds-rss-stats-tracking#comment-37062</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ Kohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=15921#comment-37062</guid>
		<description>Well, this answers my question as to why my subscriber count went from 113 to 787 overnight. I have mixed feelings about this since it may provide an incentive for people to accumulate subscribers on FriendFeed to &#039;juice&#039; that number. 

It&#039;s my opinion that FriendFeed has dodged much of the Twitter inanity by not having these types of incentives in place. That said, it sure is nice to see that number go up, and it will likely encourage others who visit to subscribe. (Popularity breeds popularity.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this answers my question as to why my subscriber count went from 113 to 787 overnight. I have mixed feelings about this since it may provide an incentive for people to accumulate subscribers on FriendFeed to &#8216;juice&#8217; that number. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s my opinion that FriendFeed has dodged much of the Twitter inanity by not having these types of incentives in place. That said, it sure is nice to see that number go up, and it will likely encourage others who visit to subscribe. (Popularity breeds popularity.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Arndt</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/friendfeed-adds-rss-stats-tracking#comment-37054</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Arndt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=15921#comment-37054</guid>
		<description>I had a 2,500 subscriber boost today. I figured Feedburner was broken. This explains it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a 2,500 subscriber boost today. I figured Feedburner was broken. This explains it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Stern</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/friendfeed-adds-rss-stats-tracking#comment-37040</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Stern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=15921#comment-37040</guid>
		<description>Rob - that is the sample image from FF not my numbers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob &#8211; that is the sample image from FF not my numbers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double the RSS Subscribers? Thank You, FriendFeed!&#160;&#124;&#160;NowSourcing</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/friendfeed-adds-rss-stats-tracking#comment-37006</link>
		<dc:creator>Double the RSS Subscribers? Thank You, FriendFeed!&#160;&#124;&#160;NowSourcing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=15921#comment-37006</guid>
		<description>[...] overall statistics, some say that very little difference is made. At some level this is true, but it does finally account what some folks use to keep up on new posts into the numbers. These numbers do make a difference, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] overall statistics, some say that very little difference is made. At some level this is true, but it does finally account what some folks use to keep up on new posts into the numbers. These numbers do make a difference, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/friendfeed-adds-rss-stats-tracking#comment-36967</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=15921#comment-36967</guid>
		<description>Allen

Based on your image, it looks like you should have received almost 12000 new subscribers in your stats. Maybe something else is not updated properly. Adding 12000 would likely have an effect greater than just a jump of 17.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allen</p>
<p>Based on your image, it looks like you should have received almost 12000 new subscribers in your stats. Maybe something else is not updated properly. Adding 12000 would likely have an effect greater than just a jump of 17.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben McKay</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/friendfeed-adds-rss-stats-tracking#comment-36963</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben McKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centernetworks.com/?p=15921#comment-36963</guid>
		<description>I was on Twitter regarding this early today - my &#039;subscribers&#039; jumped by 167 which, although nice, I wasn&#039;t to sure.  

Cheers for passing this on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was on Twitter regarding this early today &#8211; my &#8216;subscribers&#8217; jumped by 167 which, although nice, I wasn&#8217;t to sure.  </p>
<p>Cheers for passing this on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 388/389 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.centernetworks.com @ 2012-02-12 22:58:23 -->
