<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Friendfeed vs. Using Friendfeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/friendfeed-user-participation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/friendfeed-user-participation</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:50:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Use FriendFeed: Listen and be Heard! &#124; The TechnoMystic</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/friendfeed-user-participation/comment-page-1#comment-22571</link>
		<dc:creator>Use FriendFeed: Listen and be Heard! &#124; The TechnoMystic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22571</guid>
		<description>[...] printed as comments in response to: Using Friendfeed vs. Using Friendfeed by Allen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] printed as comments in response to: Using Friendfeed vs. Using Friendfeed by Allen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Scoble</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/friendfeed-user-participation/comment-page-#comment-22143</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Scoble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22143</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve sent hundreds of thousands of visits to TechCrunch and other blogs on friendfeed and twitter. That seems to be a good reason for them to bring their headlines into friendfeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve sent hundreds of thousands of visits to TechCrunch and other blogs on friendfeed and twitter. That seems to be a good reason for them to bring their headlines into friendfeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elijah Bailey (zu)</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/friendfeed-user-participation/comment-page-#comment-22144</link>
		<dc:creator>Elijah Bailey (zu)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22144</guid>
		<description>&quot;But if these passive publishers don&#039;t participate on other blogs, what makes you think they will participate on Friendfeed? I do believe that everyone should have a Friendfeed account and participate as a passive publisher. There&#039;s just no reason not to. &quot;

I think you&#039;re absolutely right. You see in some example how you can find a lot of passive users that are actually known but don&#039;t interact with their feeds on the FriendFeed service. Another problem is how to get the attention of others, liking or commenting and bringing life to the discussion. Sometimes, that active publisher can also lose interest in participating only, and gets out of that realm for that reason. Everything must depend on the willingness and openness attributed to oneself to be able to fulfill the role of the active and followed publisher, as mental enemies are virtually anywhere to destroy the dream invoked by the presence of those technical capabilities. Great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But if these passive publishers don&#8217;t participate on other blogs, what makes you think they will participate on Friendfeed? I do believe that everyone should have a Friendfeed account and participate as a passive publisher. There&#8217;s just no reason not to. &#8221;</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re absolutely right. You see in some example how you can find a lot of passive users that are actually known but don&#8217;t interact with their feeds on the FriendFeed service. Another problem is how to get the attention of others, liking or commenting and bringing life to the discussion. Sometimes, that active publisher can also lose interest in participating only, and gets out of that realm for that reason. Everything must depend on the willingness and openness attributed to oneself to be able to fulfill the role of the active and followed publisher, as mental enemies are virtually anywhere to destroy the dream invoked by the presence of those technical capabilities. Great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/friendfeed-user-participation/comment-page-#comment-22145</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22145</guid>
		<description>&quot;Serious&quot; bloggers and publishers can&#039;t afford to just be passive users of the platform. Some of the most lively conversations and debates are now taking place within the FriendFeed comment stream, and not directly within the publishers comment streams. 

By not participating, or using tools like Backtype and Disqus, passive publishers risk losing out on a growing (and interesting) segment of engagement taking place around their content.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Serious&#8221; bloggers and publishers can&#8217;t afford to just be passive users of the platform. Some of the most lively conversations and debates are now taking place within the FriendFeed comment stream, and not directly within the publishers comment streams. </p>
<p>By not participating, or using tools like Backtype and Disqus, passive publishers risk losing out on a growing (and interesting) segment of engagement taking place around their content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
