<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google is bubble watched</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/google-is-bubble-watched/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/google-is-bubble-watched</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:50:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim McAlpin</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/google-is-bubble-watched/comment-page-#comment-11410</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim McAlpin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11410</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I wish dave winer would list reasons as to why he thinks google will/would/should crash. I think its just pure random to say that it will. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish dave winer would list reasons as to why he thinks google will/would/should crash. I think its just pure random to say that it will. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/google-is-bubble-watched/comment-page-#comment-11411</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11411</guid>
		<description>I am starting to look else where for my searchs to be honest. I have not found anywhere yet but if someone comes up with a better search engine then I am there. Googles constant battle with people trying to game thier results is starting to damage the search results. 

An example.

You come across a site and can&#039;t remember what it was called but you can exactly remember what the article was called. Type that into google and 9 times out of ten you cannot find what you are looking for.

its great for finding information but not for finding sites that you are looking for. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am starting to look else where for my searchs to be honest. I have not found anywhere yet but if someone comes up with a better search engine then I am there. Googles constant battle with people trying to game thier results is starting to damage the search results. </p>
<p>An example.</p>
<p>You come across a site and can&#8217;t remember what it was called but you can exactly remember what the article was called. Type that into google and 9 times out of ten you cannot find what you are looking for.</p>
<p>its great for finding information but not for finding sites that you are looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
