<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview with Marnie Webb, ext337.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/interview-with-marnie-webb/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/interview-with-marnie-webb</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:50:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: till</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/interview-with-marnie-webb/comment-page-#comment-11300</link>
		<dc:creator>till</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11300</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been following the microformats discussion for a while now and it would be interesting to know why people put so much efford into creating XML&#039;ed microformats, when there is the semantic web, which is both easy to read and easy to parse/work with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been following the microformats discussion for a while now and it would be interesting to know why people put so much efford into creating XML&#8217;ed microformats, when there is the semantic web, which is both easy to read and easy to parse/work with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
