<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this really &#8220;Web 2.0 Television&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/is-this-really-web-2-0-television/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/is-this-really-web-2-0-television</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:50:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ty Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/is-this-really-web-2-0-television/comment-page-#comment-13666</link>
		<dc:creator>Ty Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13666</guid>
		<description>When the internet came along we had a ton of badly designed web sites because everyone had their own interpretation of what a web page should be. Now we know different. It&#039;s disappointing that you would make fun at this site instead of focusing on the real story which is the fact that there are going to be A LOT of these types of sites created for niche audiences and web 2.0 or 3.0 or whatever number you want to call it is only people&#039;s attempts to define the problem: distribution. 

How many of these sites will tip without solid distribution to eyeballs? Few to none. When you redefine TV you redefine the fundamental problem of why TV has flourished: massive ubiquitous distribution - then content quality. Pay attention, soon, everyone is going to get blipd! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the internet came along we had a ton of badly designed web sites because everyone had their own interpretation of what a web page should be. Now we know different. It&#8217;s disappointing that you would make fun at this site instead of focusing on the real story which is the fact that there are going to be A LOT of these types of sites created for niche audiences and web 2.0 or 3.0 or whatever number you want to call it is only people&#8217;s attempts to define the problem: distribution. </p>
<p>How many of these sites will tip without solid distribution to eyeballs? Few to none. When you redefine TV you redefine the fundamental problem of why TV has flourished: massive ubiquitous distribution &#8211; then content quality. Pay attention, soon, everyone is going to get blipd!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren should logged in</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/is-this-really-web-2-0-television/comment-page-#comment-13670</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren should logged in</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13670</guid>
		<description>web 2.0 tv would solve the family arguments over who wants to watch what on TV by allowing the family members to digg what they want to want. The program with the highest diggs gets shown :p </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>web 2.0 tv would solve the family arguments over who wants to watch what on TV by allowing the family members to digg what they want to want. The program with the highest diggs gets shown :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: centernetworks</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/is-this-really-web-2-0-television/comment-page-#comment-13801</link>
		<dc:creator>centernetworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13801</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh that would be fun! But Mommy I don&#039;t want to watch Dr Phil, wiggles got more diggs!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That would be an awesome cartoon.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh that would be fun! But Mommy I don&#39;t want to watch Dr Phil, wiggles got more diggs!</p>
<p>That would be an awesome cartoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
