Newest Content
Latest NYC Coverage
NY Web Tech Directory
Most Popular Content
Freshly Baked Jobs
Press Releases
New Interviews
Recent comments
- Re: Video Interview With The Founders of Drop.io
54 sec ago - Re: Twitter Down: If They Can't Handle FOWA, How Will They
3 min 54 sec ago - Re: Twitter Down: If They Can't Handle FOWA, How Will They
11 min 48 sec ago - Re: Twitter Down: If They Can't Handle FOWA, How Will They
41 min 18 sec ago - Re: Twitter Down: If They Can't Handle FOWA, How Will They
41 min 37 sec ago
IZEA's Ted Murphy Suggests He Performs Better Than The A-List Blogs
IZEA (formerly PayPerPost) CEO Ted Murphy is on the offensive today. Last night he asked me on Twitter to review a post on the IZEA blog regarding performance of his paid blog network versus an advertising campaign on ReadWriteWeb (RWW), an "a-list" tech blog. If you read only a few posts today, his should be one of them. In general, Murphy's analysis could work for any display advertising.
He begins by explaining that he purchased a one-month advertisement on ReadWriteWeb for $3,000 and then purchased $3,000 worth of paid posts within the IZEA network. The paid posts came from 220 publishers of all sizes across the network.
His analysis then goes on to determine that 725 clicks came from RWW over the month while his paid blog posts delivered 832 clicks and that the paid blog posts will continue to return some value over time as the posts live on forever (whatever forever means in Internet years).
Murphy also notes that by posting the "job" on his network, he had at least another 500 of his paid bloggers check out the company - that's already nearly more than RWW sent. He ends the analysis with the following statement, "people clicking links in sponsored posts have a genuine interest in the site they are clicking through to." The average Internet user has no idea what sponsored means. I've tried to explain this to Jason Calacanis as well but shrugged it off.
Was IZEA's product the right one for the RWW audience? For example, last month TechCrunch ran a sponsor ad for car tires. Do people looking for the latest tech news care about car tires? Are they in the "zone" to go purchase a set of 170R15s? We know nothing about the people who visited from either RWW or the purchased blog posts. How many from either actually "converted"? Murphy leaves this out.
While Murphy's analysis isn't spot on and there are some huge holes in his theory, he is pushing the conversation of display advertising versus paid posts a step further. It's a good discussion to have. And for clarity, I am not in favor of paid reviews. I am totally in favor of advertorials on blogs. Mark my words that by the end of 2008 we will see advertorials on blogs as a normal course of business.
Murphy makes a challenge at the end to Pete Cashmore, Robert Scoble and Jason Calacanis. He wants to run a paid post on one of their sites and compare the results to a wide campaign using the publisher network on IZEA. I assume he won't get any takers for the test.












Oh that ted!
nice to see you around here sean!
I bet if it's a post/ad about Seagate, Robert Scoble would be willing to run that paid post. It's not about the concept; it's just about who's paying the bill. ;)
perhaps!
Allen: Although I see what you were suggesting with the TechCrunch/Tire comparison, I think it may confuse more than it sheds light on the case study. I'd guess a web analytics site (the site advertised) is dead-on for a RWW audience with the following affinities:
Science & Technology Affinity
Techcrunch 55.3x
Popular Science 21.2x
physorg.com 20.0x
EurekAlert! 18.2x
Technology Affinity
ars technica 27.2x
lifehacker.com 19.1x
ComputerWorld 17.0x
Slashdot 14.9x
In fact, RWW has written at least 6 posts tagged "analytics" since January and Compete is an advertiser.
As for "how many converted" I guess the question is what constitutes a "conversion" for a given campaign. If the primary goal of this campaign was to expose as many blog readers/writers as possible to IZEARanks website and introduce RealRank as the industry's first "open algorithm" ranking, then a click is the conversion. If it was more, then that should have been tracked.
All that said, nice post moving the conversation forward and it will be interesting to see if any elite bloggers are up for Ted's next challenge.
BTW: Advertorials are already a subset of what is possible with IZEA's latest platform: SocialSpark.
FWIW I totally regret running that ad now, I had no knowledge that this would be used as a 'case study' for branded ads vs sponsored posts - which is apples and oranges! It was also below the belt to run the stats I gave them, in confidence as an advertiser, as a public post.
Also fwiw, that Izea ad had one of the poorest CTR of the month. Perhaps it wasn't so relevant to our readers after all...
Richard,
To clarify all of the stats provided in my post were from within our own system, not any provided data you shared with us (which I never even saw). The screen shots and numbers used are from Google Analytics, not an ad serving program. Nothing published was provided by you.
note: comments may take up to 5 minutes to appear due to cache