<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jason Calacanis Makes &#8220;The World&#8217;s Greatest Coffee!&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/jason-calacanis-web3-definition/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/jason-calacanis-web3-definition</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:50:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/jason-calacanis-web3-definition/comment-page-#comment-14388</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14388</guid>
		<description>What drives me up the wall is that the web is not software - it&#039;s an environment/community sum total of many parts and people.

You don&#039;t just go from web 2.0 to web 3.0. There aren&#039;t even dot releases. It&#039;s just... the web.

Plus, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.conversationmarketing.com/2007/08/every_time_you_say_web_20_a_ki.htm&quot;&gt;you&#039;re killing kittens&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What drives me up the wall is that the web is not software &#8211; it&#8217;s an environment/community sum total of many parts and people.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t just go from web 2.0 to web 3.0. There aren&#8217;t even dot releases. It&#8217;s just&#8230; the web.</p>
<p>Plus, <a href="http://www.conversationmarketing.com/2007/08/every_time_you_say_web_20_a_ki.htm">you&#8217;re killing kittens</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/jason-calacanis-web3-definition/comment-page-#comment-14389</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14389</guid>
		<description>What drives me up the wall is that the web is not software - it&#039;s an environment/community sum total of many parts and people.

You don&#039;t just go from web 2.0 to web 3.0. There aren&#039;t even dot releases. It&#039;s just... the web.

Plus, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.conversationmarketing.com/2007/08/every_time_you_say_web_20_a_ki.htm&quot;&gt;you&#039;re killing kittens&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What drives me up the wall is that the web is not software &#8211; it&#8217;s an environment/community sum total of many parts and people.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t just go from web 2.0 to web 3.0. There aren&#8217;t even dot releases. It&#8217;s just&#8230; the web.</p>
<p>Plus, <a href="http://www.conversationmarketing.com/2007/08/every_time_you_say_web_20_a_ki.htm">you&#8217;re killing kittens</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/jason-calacanis-web3-definition/comment-page-#comment-14390</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14390</guid>
		<description>Yes, yes I do.

I also make a great linkbait latte. ;-)

j</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, yes I do.</p>
<p>I also make a great linkbait latte. ;-)</p>
<p>j</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: centernetworks</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/jason-calacanis-web3-definition/comment-page-#comment-14391</link>
		<dc:creator>centernetworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14391</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;
don&#039;t you have some fancy coffee pot at your mahalo office? i thought i saw a pic of it somewhere. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I have always said that you do a great job of keeping yourself in the spotlight because the minute your ego-radar lowers to defcon 2 - you just create something or make something up to raise it back to defcon 5. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&#160;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
don&#8217;t you have some fancy coffee pot at your mahalo office? i thought i saw a pic of it somewhere.
</p>
<p>
I have always said that you do a great job of keeping yourself in the spotlight because the minute your ego-radar lowers to defcon 2 &#8211; you just create something or make something up to raise it back to defcon 5.
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/jason-calacanis-web3-definition/comment-page-#comment-15064</link>
		<dc:creator>James Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15064</guid>
		<description>Yes, but when you&#039;re linkbaiting so people will laugh at your absurdity, it doesn&#039;t do you much good.

Here... you can have a taste of the reputation you have amongst web developers:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mentallyretired.com/2007/08/29/mahalo-human-powered-hype/&quot;&gt;Mahalo: Human powered hype&lt;/a&gt;


--
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mentallyretired.com&quot;&gt;MentallyRetired&lt;/a&gt; &#124; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wackylabs.com&quot;&gt;WackyLabs LLC&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but when you&#8217;re linkbaiting so people will laugh at your absurdity, it doesn&#8217;t do you much good.</p>
<p>Here&#8230; you can have a taste of the reputation you have amongst web developers:  <a href="http://www.mentallyretired.com/2007/08/29/mahalo-human-powered-hype/">Mahalo: Human powered hype</a></p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://www.mentallyretired.com">MentallyRetired</a> | <a href="http://www.wackylabs.com">WackyLabs LLC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Ismail</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/jason-calacanis-web3-definition/comment-page-#comment-15081</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Ismail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15081</guid>
		<description>By posting and linking to him aren&#039;t you just perpetuating the kind of attention he&#039;s looking to grab? :P

And people discounting Web2.0 as a concept are being a little too elitist. Obviously it&#039;s the Web, but to deny that there hasn&#039;t been a movement and shift in the way we perceive the web is going too far. I&#039;m sure a simple graph could explain this pretty clearly.

Anybody proclaiming Web3.0 now, as you&#039;ve correctly pointed out is just looking for headlines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By posting and linking to him aren&#8217;t you just perpetuating the kind of attention he&#8217;s looking to grab? :P</p>
<p>And people discounting Web2.0 as a concept are being a little too elitist. Obviously it&#8217;s the Web, but to deny that there hasn&#8217;t been a movement and shift in the way we perceive the web is going too far. I&#8217;m sure a simple graph could explain this pretty clearly.</p>
<p>Anybody proclaiming Web3.0 now, as you&#8217;ve correctly pointed out is just looking for headlines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: centernetworks</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/jason-calacanis-web3-definition/comment-page-#comment-15083</link>
		<dc:creator>centernetworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15083</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;
Trust me, Linking to him is not something I enjoy - in fact, I need override #2 just to enter his URL! :)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I have been doing this thing since it began and I agree that there was a shift and so forth - but it&#039;s merged into &quot;web&quot; and it&#039;s now just the Web. I wish I could draw the image in my head so I could explain what I mean in pictures.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Omar - let&#039;s get a patent on Web 11 now so we are ready for 2014 :)
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Trust me, Linking to him is not something I enjoy &#8211; in fact, I need override #2 just to enter his URL! :)
</p>
<p>
I have been doing this thing since it began and I agree that there was a shift and so forth &#8211; but it&#8217;s merged into &quot;web&quot; and it&#8217;s now just the Web. I wish I could draw the image in my head so I could explain what I mean in pictures.
</p>
<p>
Omar &#8211; let&#8217;s get a patent on Web 11 now so we are ready for 2014 :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/jason-calacanis-web3-definition/comment-page-#comment-15084</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15084</guid>
		<description>Of course you can&#039;t possibly claim that the Internet has not changed drastically over the years.  However, if we were to start breaking down all of the significant changes since the Web began, we would certainly not be simply at the dawning of &quot;Web 3.0&quot;.  We would be at the dawning of something like &quot;Web 27.4&quot;.

The addition of graphics to Web sites would have been the first re-versioning of the Web.

Also, I have to agree with Allen&#039;s reasoning when he says that Web 3.0 sounds just like Web 2.0.  With such a minor change, shouldn&#039;t it really be &quot;Web 2.0.1b&quot; or something?  Maybe I spend too much time playing with developmental software, but I certainly would not apply an entirely new version number for such a minuscule change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course you can&#8217;t possibly claim that the Internet has not changed drastically over the years.  However, if we were to start breaking down all of the significant changes since the Web began, we would certainly not be simply at the dawning of &#8220;Web 3.0&#8243;.  We would be at the dawning of something like &#8220;Web 27.4&#8243;.</p>
<p>The addition of graphics to Web sites would have been the first re-versioning of the Web.</p>
<p>Also, I have to agree with Allen&#8217;s reasoning when he says that Web 3.0 sounds just like Web 2.0.  With such a minor change, shouldn&#8217;t it really be &#8220;Web 2.0.1b&#8221; or something?  Maybe I spend too much time playing with developmental software, but I certainly would not apply an entirely new version number for such a minuscule change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
