CATEGORIES
- NYC COVERAGE
- WEB STARTUPS
- WEB NEWS
- CONFERENCES
- WEB TECH JOBS
- VENTURE CAPITAL
- MICROSOFT
- INTERVIEWS
- ADVERTISING
- VIDEO
- ALL TOPICS
- ALL COMPANIES
CONTRIBUTORS
- ADRIAN CHAN
- ALICIA NAVARRO
- ALLEN STERN
- CORSIN CAMICHEL
- DRAMA 2.0
- DARREN HERMAN
- HANK WILLIAMS
- MARK DAVIS
- RICK TUROCZY
- SANFORD DICKERT
- SHANNON CLARK
- Comment on YouTube Down by DVS01
- Comment on Twitter COO Costolo: Advertising Coming To Twitter Soon by Satoshi Nakajima
- Comment on Twitter COO Costolo: Advertising Coming To Twitter Soon by OMG Stop the Web! Twitter is gonna run ads ? and Scoble says you?ll love it
- Comment on What?s Up With Yahoo Mail Delivery? by MJ
My Take on the Calacanis Email Missive
Mahalo CEO Jason Calacnis has posted an in-depth email to his huge private mailing list this evening to provide more details about the firings and changes at Mahalo today. While I can’t republish the email, I thought I would provide my honest thoughts on his comments.
Jason begins with today’s post from his blog. I’d have thought the post would have been better placed on the Mahalo blog. It’s important to speak to your customers more than anything.
He then explains that he still has 30 FT staff across 6 offices in California and more than 50 freelancers. In his interview last week in London with Intruders Jason stated that they have 100 FT plus 200-300 freelancers. Not sure which number is accurate.
I will agree with Jason that there’s nothing worse than having to look an employee in the face and telling them that they are no longer employed with x firm. It’s not something any manager ever wants to have to do. This part of his email is well worth reading.
Jason notes that most of the Mahalo reorg was handled while he was out traveling the world. He explains that he pushed his executives to come up with a cost-savings plan within two weeks which included five days to analyze and execute the plan. With 4 years of money "even if we never generate a penny" why was there a need to rush to a decision? Why not take the time to accurately look at the situation? I am still confused at how the economy is playing a role in today’s decision. From my perspective and to be completely honest, after reading his email, his blog post and the other reviews today, I get the sense that today’s announcement is a traditional business restructuring rather than directly due to the current economy.
Jason compares firing staff members with a sports team coach letting players go at training camp. This is really an unfair comparison. The people that Jason has fired/restructured are the people who built Mahalo and apparently put in their blood, sweat and tears. A fairer (but not accurate either) comparison would be a coach firing his/her offensive line the day before the superbowl.
He wants the company to have four years of runway with no income coming in — this was his goal with today’s restructuring. He was spending two editorial dollars for every technology dollar — this makes sense considering his vision is for a human network, not a computer network.
He goes on to explain that the people who work at home are significantly cheaper than full-time employees. Isn’t that usually how it works? So what cuts were there?
- Mahalo daily video editors are now contract employees – Jason doesn’t specify if these employees get any benefits at all
- They swapped their phone lines to save $1.5/month – although I thought this was done earlier this year?
- They rent out office space to other companies
- He won’t be traveling the world anymore – even though last week in Asia he said that Americans should travel outside the U.S. – 10-12x a year to be successful
- They have moved "aggressively" to a freelance workforce – this means no benefits, no stock. This is so different than everything I’ve heard from Jason to-date.
- We also learned that Jason likes to blog from his garden near his pool
Jason then shifts to revenues where he explains that they have "aggresively" started running Google AdSense. This is clearly noticeable as the ads mirror the content exactly. My gramma would never be able to tell the difference. Good to see Jason be upfront about the change here. He’s also working on partnership deals around content – if he can close 20% of them, it will help cut their spending by 10%. He ends by explaining that they are focusing on building revenue now – and I completely agree with this.
Jason doesn’t believe an end to the current financial situation is in sight.
He shares some points around executing the workforce reductions:
- do it all at once – I agree, pull the bandaid off at once versus slowly don’t sugarcoat it
- cutting salaries is typically worse than cutting headcount – I generally agree, large companies do this pretty often – fire the expensive workers and replace them with cheaper less experienced talent. Of course in today’s market
- you can grab top quality talent for a much cheaper price.
- give severance – i’d like to see him share what he did for his employees today. when they moved to freelancer status, did he pay out their stock options? this is where i’d like some answers.
- get everyone focused again – frankly my suggestion is to close the office for a day – let people clear the air – especially with today’s internet – all of his staff will be reading posts like crazy – let them clear their heads and take a deep breath.
I leave you with this… I’ve said since day 1 that for Mahalo to survive they have to move away from humans and more to technology. I continue this belief with today’s announcement. And just like I said in my previous post, if there’s anyone affected today by the job cuts at Mahalo (or anywhere else), drop me a line if there’s something I can help with. (don’t ask for money though, I have none to give)







From a strictly business point of view, this doesn’t have the vaguest appearance of being associated with a down turning economy, it is directly correlated to how VC is managed. The economy has been declining a LONG time. In this instance, it doesn’t appear good stewardship was exercised and there was apparently not a conservative, prudent business plan in place to weather things; if there were and if there was solid accountability, slight adjustments could be made without the drastic measures you see being made now. The people you assemble to move a project along are the backbone of your work and the lifeblood of it; dismissing or diminishing their capacity is nothing like the sports team analogy; it’s more like draining your car of oil and hoping you’ll get around okay.
One other thing that hasn’t really been mentioned and that’s integrity. All leaders in this venture seem to have been asleep at the wheel, or at the very least not holding each other accountable and acting as checkpoints for each other. At this moment, there is need for an enormous amount of self control, self restraint, and self reflection. I hope the lesson is not missed here. There is much we can all learn here and these guys certainly have their work cut out for them. Let’s hope they roll up their sleeves and get into the thick of it and get back on track.
@Drama, I have always wondered this too! I could care less what other people do, but I’m always like, how do all these people 1. cover the constant expense of travel (just because you own a startup does NOT mean you’re rich) and 2. how do they have time? a lot of the events are the same group of people over and over too – does marketing to the same group repeatedly really pay off or does that box a start up in like we’ve seen with Digg?
I never have time to even get ready to go out, let alone go out, and I’m no where running as big of a company as most people. My angels that I’ve got hip pocketed for when needed said first thing was that they look down on extravagant spending, etc. in a person’s personal life. One said, “if i see that, i wonder: why do you need my money?”
I also always notice the people who actually have done big things, like Jeff Skoll, etc., are never out self-evangelizing. I guess the argument is that they don’t need to, but I kind of think it’s more about not needing to be ’stars’. It’s so easy to become a celebrity these days – it takes nothing. No longer a big achievement IMO.
excellent (maybe a bit long) recap – there’s no doubt that jason is using this as an excuse.
Thoughtful post, Allen. It’s hard to tell what’s spin and what’s fact when the companies that are laying off employees tell their stories. From my perspective, one thing is certain: economy or not, most of these startups had major problems to begin with.
As it relates to Mahalo, I think it’s fitting that Calacanis was “traveling the world” when he felt the need to make this decision.
I wrote about Calacanis’ “extracurricular activities” in a post earlier:
http://www.drama20show.com/2008/10/22/mahalo-joins-the-layoff-list/
In a few years when the Valley looks back at this latest round of irrational exuberance, I hope one of the things that people notice is the presence of the “celebrity” CEO/founder. From Jason Calacanis to Kevin Rose to Mark Zuckerberg, I’ve always been amazed at just how many of the executives that are crucial to the success of their startups always seem to be out and about “livin’ the life” – traveling, speaking at conferences, partying, working on “side projects,” etc.
I was equally amazed that so many people never bothered to ask – how can a startup achieve success when it’s leaders seem to be doing everything but working (especially when the companies these people are involved with have known issues with revenue and only surviving on VC money)?
While the outcome for many of these startups probably wouldn’t have been any different had these CEOs/founders been on the ball 24/7, that’s little comfort to the employees who trusted that their management teams were actually performing their jobs competently.
The buck stops with management and if this “celebrity” CEO lifestyle is accepted as being compatible with “leadership” in the Silicon Valley startup scene, the economy should be the least of the Valley’s worries.