<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MediaForge Launches Social Marketing Widgets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/mediaforge-social-marketing-widgets/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/mediaforge-social-marketing-widgets</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:50:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jughead</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/mediaforge-social-marketing-widgets/comment-page-#comment-17876</link>
		<dc:creator>Jughead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17876</guid>
		<description>This seems like the easiest upgrade sale to an advertiser ever. &quot;Do you want that clunky banner ad that nobody looked at before to become a critical delivery mechanism to your prospective clients?&quot; 

Or you could also say to the advertiser, &quot;Do you want to press a button and send news, product and sales info specifically tailored to your prospects immediate interests right to their eyeballs via the power of RSS contained within an interactive banner widget?&quot;.....DUH!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like the easiest upgrade sale to an advertiser ever. &#8220;Do you want that clunky banner ad that nobody looked at before to become a critical delivery mechanism to your prospective clients?&#8221; </p>
<p>Or you could also say to the advertiser, &#8220;Do you want to press a button and send news, product and sales info specifically tailored to your prospects immediate interests right to their eyeballs via the power of RSS contained within an interactive banner widget?&#8221;&#8230;..DUH!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/mediaforge-social-marketing-widgets/comment-page-#comment-17884</link>
		<dc:creator>William Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17884</guid>
		<description>Would any of you actually put a widget for Overstock (or name a company you&#039;re loyal to) on your desktop? Would you click on an ad there even if it was targeted?

I wouldn&#039;t.

I am a huge Apple fan boy. I am not cluttering my screen with an apple branded window pushing me offers. 

I don&#039;t see widgets being useful for marketing. Maybe I am the only one. Its hard for me to think of a compelling reason to voluntarily place ads on my screen, even if there was an incentive to do so. 

William</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would any of you actually put a widget for Overstock (or name a company you&#8217;re loyal to) on your desktop? Would you click on an ad there even if it was targeted?</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I am a huge Apple fan boy. I am not cluttering my screen with an apple branded window pushing me offers. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see widgets being useful for marketing. Maybe I am the only one. Its hard for me to think of a compelling reason to voluntarily place ads on my screen, even if there was an incentive to do so. </p>
<p>William</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alisamleo</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/mediaforge-social-marketing-widgets/comment-page-#comment-18794</link>
		<dc:creator>alisamleo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18794</guid>
		<description>Sounds interesting, but not too novel. And while I agree more companies will turn to widgets vs. banners, its still only a slight step in the right direction. Its only taking digital marketing with a side of social media instead of completely shifting the marketing paradigm, which, of all people, digital marekting seems to be the slowest to adapt to...need i say it? beyond CPM and click-throughs to engagement (ps having a widget on your desktop and still measuring click-throughs is NOT &#039;engagement&#039;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds interesting, but not too novel. And while I agree more companies will turn to widgets vs. banners, its still only a slight step in the right direction. Its only taking digital marketing with a side of social media instead of completely shifting the marketing paradigm, which, of all people, digital marekting seems to be the slowest to adapt to&#8230;need i say it? beyond CPM and click-throughs to engagement (ps having a widget on your desktop and still measuring click-throughs is NOT &#8216;engagement&#8217;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elizatgman</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/mediaforge-social-marketing-widgets/comment-page-#comment-18796</link>
		<dc:creator>elizatgman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18796</guid>
		<description>I think the widget allows for actual commerce and special deals to be offered through the widget only whereas the banner ad clicks are just one measure.  Isn&#039;t that engagement?  If I were a brand and wanted to gain immediate feedback from my most loyal customers, what better way to get that than through a desktop widget?  If I&#039;m a fanatic of all things Britany Spears (sp?) and I can get a desktop alert from my favorite tabloid of something new and interesting to me, wouldn&#039;t I want that?  By distributing these things through wide banner buys, both the publisher/brand and the consumer are reached in a graphically rich, expanded reach manner.  If these advertisers are buying the banner anyway, why wouldn&#039;t they want to take this &quot;slight step&quot; as you say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the widget allows for actual commerce and special deals to be offered through the widget only whereas the banner ad clicks are just one measure.  Isn&#8217;t that engagement?  If I were a brand and wanted to gain immediate feedback from my most loyal customers, what better way to get that than through a desktop widget?  If I&#8217;m a fanatic of all things Britany Spears (sp?) and I can get a desktop alert from my favorite tabloid of something new and interesting to me, wouldn&#8217;t I want that?  By distributing these things through wide banner buys, both the publisher/brand and the consumer are reached in a graphically rich, expanded reach manner.  If these advertisers are buying the banner anyway, why wouldn&#8217;t they want to take this &#8220;slight step&#8221; as you say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/mediaforge-social-marketing-widgets/comment-page-#comment-18814</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18814</guid>
		<description>For the most part, I agree. However, I believe that for most brands there is no significant future for e-commerce in what we&#039;re now calling social media. For example, I would never want to place  an Overstock or an Amazon widget on my MySpace page or Facebook profile. Although some e-comm brands have a lifestyle agenda, e.g., Nike (it&#039;s more than selling shoes), the majority of e-retailers do not engender a lifestyle and focus entirely on conversions (e.g., eCost). A more appropriate term would be conversational marketing/media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part, I agree. However, I believe that for most brands there is no significant future for e-commerce in what we&#8217;re now calling social media. For example, I would never want to place  an Overstock or an Amazon widget on my MySpace page or Facebook profile. Although some e-comm brands have a lifestyle agenda, e.g., Nike (it&#8217;s more than selling shoes), the majority of e-retailers do not engender a lifestyle and focus entirely on conversions (e.g., eCost). A more appropriate term would be conversational marketing/media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
