Music & Religion

hank williamsThere is a rumor that has been circulating that Apple is going to be introducing a music subscription service like Rhapsody. I don’t know if it is true, but hope that it is. I love music subscription services, and am a current subscriber to Rhapsody, but I would switch to Apple in a minute so I could use my neat iPod with it.

But what triggered me wanting to write about this was not the rumor, but the reaction to the rumor by certain quarters. Specifically, whenever you read about subscription services, you always read vehement and angry comments from people that don’t like the idea of subscriptions. It is certainly fine to not want it for yourself. But what is odd to me is the anger that said people have at the idea that I might want something different.

It’s fascinating that this response always comes from the "free" music crowd, and yet I am confident, if they had a magic wand, they would make such services illegal, or so socially or politically unacceptable that they would not be offered.

This vehemence strikes me as strange because clearly I should have the right to buy something the way I want and a vendor should have the right to sell it to me in the way that s/he wants.

In short, it strikes me that the free music crowd is really more a religious movement than one based in logic and reason. It is very similar to the way that certain fundamentalist religious groups demonize people for different beliefs. Here the free music community demonizes subscription services because, by definition, subscriptions must use DRM, which is "evil". And the irrational zealous passion brought to bear is exactly analogous to the behavior of every out of control religious group in human history. Ok, they haven’t gotten to burning people at the stake, but you know what I mean.

The point is, even if you have the wacky view that all music or intellectual property should be free, the idea that you should consider business and interaction models, and technologies like DRM that don’t match your world view to be "evil", is, to me, bizarre. This is particularly true when the DRM *enables* a, compelling, at least for some, business model such as subscriptions.

As I see it, this movement would be more appropriately lead by a religious figure like Pat Robertson, or John Hagee, or Richard Stallman, or… oh wait, it is!

This article was authored by Hank Williams who is a New York-based entrepreneur who explores the tech marketplace from 10,000 feet at Why Does Everything Suck?.

Read More: , , , , ,
RSS Feed
RSS
Google Buzz
3 COMMENTS
  1. Morgan says:

    Oh man, I love you for expressing this sentiment– sooo frustrating reading the ‘free’ folks. Their gist is basically that if revenues in the music industry are shrinking, the entire business model is irretrievably flawed (hilarious coming from the tech-bubble crowd anyway) and so the consumer should be able to unilaterally decide what music is worth and enforce that on the producers of it, by stealing and claiming it’s not stealing. And you’re right, as if that weren’t bad enough, they seem to want to deny people the ability to freely purchase and use music the way they’d like to– I had Rhapsody and LOVED it while I had it. Loved eMusic also.

    A side note– if I listen to say 100 hours of music a month, exactly how much of a cheapskate do I have to be to think like $10 a month is some kind of highway robbery?

  2. jason says:

    i am a fan of not paying for music content, but i spend hundreds if not thousands of dollars/year supporting artists via concerts/festivals and buying their non music stuff. i guess growing up having napster and then kazaa and then limewire and then bit torrent be the ways to access music have shaped my perception, but the fact is, the kids growing up now have even fewer memories of paying for music than i do. so going forward, there will be new ways to monetize music, and some companies get that while many companies do not. most anti-”free” music heads i have come across are people who bought records or 8-tracks or whatever you call them, while they were growing up. which is cool and all, but that isn’t the environment kids are growing up in today.

  3. Lacy Kemp says:

    Jason-
    You know, that’s a really interesting perspective and I’ve never even considered it before. It’s tough to expect people to pay for something when they’ve always been able to get it for free in the past. Personally (and professionally) I am a supporter of both models. I really really enjoy music subscription but I still purchase CDs (gasp!) and MP3s. I do not own an iPod, rather “other” portable devices, so I’ve had no trouble taking my subscription with me, and it’s quite a treat to be able to do so.
    Regardless- interesting perspective.
    Lacy

Become a sponsor

SPONSORS

CloudContacts
Clicky Web Analytics
Page.ly
Advertise here

STARTUP NEWS

twitter