<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NY Times Sued Over Linking Practice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/ny-times-sued-over-linking/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/ny-times-sued-over-linking</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:27:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/ny-times-sued-over-linking#comment-20853</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20853</guid>
		<description>&quot;But never using content from another site as the only content in a post.&quot;

Is that even a sentence? It&#039;s painful to have to read stuff like that 2 or 3 times to figure out what the author is trying to say.  Videos are fun, but if they come at the expense of some basic proofing and editing, then something&#039;s wrong. Don&#039;t worry about anyone scraping this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But never using content from another site as the only content in a post.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that even a sentence? It&#8217;s painful to have to read stuff like that 2 or 3 times to figure out what the author is trying to say.  Videos are fun, but if they come at the expense of some basic proofing and editing, then something&#8217;s wrong. Don&#8217;t worry about anyone scraping this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/ny-times-sued-over-linking#comment-20854</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20854</guid>
		<description>does this guy have a chance at beating the ny times?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does this guy have a chance at beating the ny times?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/ny-times-sued-over-linking#comment-20855</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20855</guid>
		<description>Beating? No.  But getting sued is bad PR and the media loves it, so there&#039;s always a likely possibility that they&#039;ll settle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beating? No.  But getting sued is bad PR and the media loves it, so there&#8217;s always a likely possibility that they&#8217;ll settle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/ny-times-sued-over-linking#comment-20858</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20858</guid>
		<description>This is silly

From what I understand of this, they are complaining about a deep link.

Links to the original source are much more important than a home page link, because it allows search engines to determine the original source, though that can take a bit of time, and is far from perfect.

A credit link just to a home page is bad both from a user and SEO perspective

A deep link a reader wil follow to get more about the story, and in most cases can then be guided to more relevant content, which the NYTimes or affiliate sites don&#039;t provide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is silly</p>
<p>From what I understand of this, they are complaining about a deep link.</p>
<p>Links to the original source are much more important than a home page link, because it allows search engines to determine the original source, though that can take a bit of time, and is far from perfect.</p>
<p>A credit link just to a home page is bad both from a user and SEO perspective</p>
<p>A deep link a reader wil follow to get more about the story, and in most cases can then be guided to more relevant content, which the NYTimes or affiliate sites don&#8217;t provide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/ny-times-sued-over-linking#comment-21760</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-21760</guid>
		<description>Newspapers have been scraping data,links and stealing keywords for years.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newspapers have been scraping data,links and stealing keywords for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 377/378 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.centernetworks.com @ 2012-02-12 19:45:00 -->
