<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OtherInbox &#8211; Email Management (video) (invites)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/otherinbox-email-management-invites/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/otherinbox-email-management-invites</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:27:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: tilll</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/otherinbox-email-management-invites#comment-19705</link>
		<dc:creator>tilll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19705</guid>
		<description>LOL - this product is kind of oldschool because essentially it uses a catch-all account and it creates folders. Which means that if people start spamming me, they will just have to do, *randomstring*@user.otherinbox.com and I will have a shitload of folders to deal with?

I&#039;m just wondering if they will still do SPAM checks on your domain, or something. Because SPAM won&#039;t go away just because it&#039;s in a folder. It will increase, because you open up your domain and make it more &quot;accessible&quot; (vulnerable) to spam.

What&#039;s too bad is that they can&#039;t push this technology back. I can totally see that it would be a true winner on top of a spam checker, just for the convenience it offers. But instead of Gmail or my own mailserver, I am supposed to use their service now. But who are they, and why would I trust them with my email?

Also, no imap, etc. support? That&#039;s kind of weak. The interface seems pretty cool though. I only looked at it briefly and I liked that part a lot.

By the way, Allen - I think Smart folders in Apple Mail allow you to do something similar. Of course you will have to set them up and it&#039;s not automatically, but it&#039;s just a couple clicks, just like, &quot;create filter/label from this message&quot; in Gmail. I bet there&#039;s even ways to automate that.

A lot of IMAP servers also support server side filtering so putting messages into a folder just takes a minute or two to create a folder and the rule. And I think this process could be optimized  as well through some interface or an automatic rule. And all at the convenience of using your own infrastructure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL &#8211; this product is kind of oldschool because essentially it uses a catch-all account and it creates folders. Which means that if people start spamming me, they will just have to do, *randomstring*@user.otherinbox.com and I will have a shitload of folders to deal with?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just wondering if they will still do SPAM checks on your domain, or something. Because SPAM won&#8217;t go away just because it&#8217;s in a folder. It will increase, because you open up your domain and make it more &#8220;accessible&#8221; (vulnerable) to spam.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s too bad is that they can&#8217;t push this technology back. I can totally see that it would be a true winner on top of a spam checker, just for the convenience it offers. But instead of Gmail or my own mailserver, I am supposed to use their service now. But who are they, and why would I trust them with my email?</p>
<p>Also, no imap, etc. support? That&#8217;s kind of weak. The interface seems pretty cool though. I only looked at it briefly and I liked that part a lot.</p>
<p>By the way, Allen &#8211; I think Smart folders in Apple Mail allow you to do something similar. Of course you will have to set them up and it&#8217;s not automatically, but it&#8217;s just a couple clicks, just like, &#8220;create filter/label from this message&#8221; in Gmail. I bet there&#8217;s even ways to automate that.</p>
<p>A lot of IMAP servers also support server side filtering so putting messages into a folder just takes a minute or two to create a folder and the rule. And I think this process could be optimized  as well through some interface or an automatic rule. And all at the convenience of using your own infrastructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peak</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/otherinbox-email-management-invites#comment-19706</link>
		<dc:creator>Peak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19706</guid>
		<description>[...]A lot of IMAP servers also support server side filtering so putting messages into a folder just takes a minute or two to create a folder and the rule.[...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]A lot of IMAP servers also support server side filtering so putting messages into a folder just takes a minute or two to create a folder and the rule.[...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/otherinbox-email-management-invites#comment-19707</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19707</guid>
		<description>Exactly. You can already do this in gmail (with a little extra work) by appending &lt;strong&gt;+&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;some-string &lt;/em&gt; to your gmail user name (e.g. &quot;my-name&lt;strong&gt;+amazon&lt;/strong&gt;@gmail.com&quot;) and then filtering on the string to apply a label and skip the inbox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. You can already do this in gmail (with a little extra work) by appending <strong>+</strong><em>some-string </em> to your gmail user name (e.g. &#8220;my-name<strong>+amazon</strong>@gmail.com&#8221;) and then filtering on the string to apply a label and skip the inbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tilll</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/otherinbox-email-management-invites#comment-19708</link>
		<dc:creator>tilll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19708</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Mark.

I didn&#039;t know that Gmail supported that either. I forgot what it&#039;s called, but many mailservers actually support that. Some even put messages into the correct folder, just by name that you add.

Sweet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mark.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t know that Gmail supported that either. I forgot what it&#8217;s called, but many mailservers actually support that. Some even put messages into the correct folder, just by name that you add.</p>
<p>Sweet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 366/367 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.centernetworks.com @ 2012-02-13 00:38:15 -->
