PayPerPost offers direct option… It’s still an advertorial. It’s not selling your soul.

PayPerPostPayPerPost has launched a new option named "Direct" which allows bloggers to sell reviews directly using the PPP processing system. ReviewMe has a similar option. Andy Beard has a very lengthy review of the new PayPerPost Direct service which he says he did not receive any monetary compensation for. Jim Kukral also reviews the service.

First, I don't understand why anyone would want to use this new system and give up 10% when they could easily sell the same service directly on their own. I guess there is a benefit to using the PayPerPost processing system but it just does not seem worth it to me unless you were running 20-30 paid reviews a week. Create your own graphic, sell the review yourself.

Second, for the majority of paid bloggers, this won't work. Why? It has nothing to do with PPP, ReviewMe or any of the other services. It has everything to do with traffic. I believe that most of the paid reviewers have very little (to medium) traffic. To make this work effectively, you need boat loads of traffic. And even more importantly, it has to be "advertiser traffic". Most of these paid blogs just don't have it. And even those that do, don't have the right type of traffic.

Mike, says that this is "selling your soul." I disagree. As I have said previously, there is nothing wrong with running an advertorial. Newspapers do it everyday and it looks just like regular news except for a tiny advertising line at the top of the page. Radio stations do it more than ever today. And they have no disclaimer when they say things like, "I am Big Papa DJ and I use Dr. Moulton's acne removal system. It removed my pimples in 2 weeks and I love it." Never a disclaimer. And the biggest radio personalities do it.

While I sometimes struggle with whether to add this type of "review" on CenterNetworks (we have not as of today), I don't think there is anything wrong with it overall. That is as long as you clearly state that this is a paid review. Is it the "review" aspect that we struggle with? I would love to see a paid Advertorial company start. No reviews. Just posting a paid advertisement as a post. Something that can easily be noted as paid and dealt with accordingly with the search engines. We all do it already. I do it. TechCrunch does it. Paid Content does it.

I do believe that PPP requiring positive reviews is not a good thing. And all of the paid review services can tell me until they are blue in the face that they don't require them. Bullhogwash. When you are receiving money for something, you tend to err on the side of the positive. Think about it like this. If you complete 10 paid reviews and bash every one of them, why would advertiser #11 want to risk it? I think the most important thing is to be "fair and balanced" in the review.

As bloggers, journalists and bloggers continue to struggle to generate revenue from their offerings, I am sure this "paid content" discussion will continue. I look forward to continuing the discussion and watching how things evolve.

Read More: ,
RSS Feed
RSS
4 COMMENTS
  1. Tony Hung says:

    Allen,

    Some good ideas, but I’ll challenge your one about blogs needing traffic.

    That argument holds water if the primary reason for the sponsored / paid post is to create traffic and buzz. In fact, I suspect many PPP advertisers are using the service for SEO purposes, as they are essentially paying for inbound links — nice, organic, varied, organic links that Google loves.

    Sure, we can debate over what Google might do in the future, but right now, there is no official policy on stuff like paid postings — and if there is (and I don’t think there is), I certainly haven’t heard about anyone getting penalized for it.

    For blogs who are interested in doing the PPP thing, this is just one more means for them to let their readers (and potential) advertisers know that their posts are for sale.

    Cheers
    tony.

  2. centernetworks says:

    Tony, yea, I don’t know about a SEO policy either at any of the major engines.

    What I meant is that with low traffic/inbound links, the blog might never be seen to be purchased.

    But I do agree with your last comment that it’s a great way to advertise that your blog does paid posts.

  3. While I have never used PPP, I have used ReviewMe and Sponsored Reviews many times. However, now that my blog has grown a bit people come to me and do direct payment for reviews, saving them money and getting me more. I’ve never tried PPP just due to the fact that advertisers can request that the review be positive – I always say it like it is, so that wouldn’t work for me.

    Allen, one of these days we need to get lunch or something. Fyi, there’s an ATL Web Entrepreneurs meetup on June 21st: http://web.meetup.com/32/

  4. centernetworks says:

    Wow Paul – I didn't know you "sell your soul". You are an aweful person and you should be banned to only eat at Varsity. There will be no more Vortex and certainly no more trips to Atlantic Station.

    Dude, we def. need to meetup but there is no hiccup, I am in NYC this year. So come up and we can go for a pastrami on rye or a real pizza (none of this Johnys NY crap) :)

    Thanks for stopping by!

Leave a Reply

Become a sponsor

SPONSORS

CloudContacts
Clicky Web Analytics
Page.ly
Advertise here

STARTUP NEWS

twitter