CATEGORIES
- NYC COVERAGE
- WEB STARTUPS
- WEB NEWS
- CONFERENCES
- WEB TECH JOBS
- VENTURE CAPITAL
- MICROSOFT
- INTERVIEWS
- ADVERTISING
- VIDEO
- ALL TOPICS
- ALL COMPANIES
CONTRIBUTORS
- ADRIAN CHAN
- ALICIA NAVARRO
- ALLEN STERN
- CORSIN CAMICHEL
- DRAMA 2.0
- DARREN HERMAN
- HANK WILLIAMS
- MARK DAVIS
- RICK TUROCZY
- SANFORD DICKERT
- SHANNON CLARK
- Comment on YouTube Down by DVS01
- Comment on Twitter COO Costolo: Advertising Coming To Twitter Soon by Satoshi Nakajima
- Comment on Twitter COO Costolo: Advertising Coming To Twitter Soon by OMG Stop the Web! Twitter is gonna run ads ? and Scoble says you?ll love it
- Comment on What?s Up With Yahoo Mail Delivery? by MJ
Celebrity vs. Celebrity
This afternoon I was part of a Entrepreneur Week panel discussing a variety of digital topics. In addition to myself, Darren Herman from The Media Kitchen, Rick Heitzmann, Managing Director at FirstMark Capital, Ross Goldstein, Co-Founder & Managing Director at DFJ Gotham Ventures sat on the panel and moderating panel was handled by Richie Hecker from Boostrapper.
During the panel, we discussed the new crop of social sites and one of the panelists (I forgot which one) mentioned that we are now all celebrities. He continued that not only are we celebrities but we are also paparazzi. I added that there is a difference between celebrities and celebrities. We are going to see more and more celebrities on Twitter in the coming days and months and I thought it was worth differentiating between celebrities and celebrities.
Twitter grew because it made us all into instant celebrities – we have fans (Twitter calls them followers). We like to believe that our fans give a crap about what we do (they don’t). For some, it’s clear that they believe they really are celebrities.
As we watch Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton or the million-follower “punk” say and do things on Twitter (and other Internet tools), it’s easy to think that everything they do online are things that we can also get away with. We can’t. When Britney screws up, it helps her sell future records. When Lindsay screws up, she gets more movie deals. When you or I screw up, it can affect us negatively. More importantly, it can affect us later on down the road as everything we do only travels with us 24×7 in our Internet briefcase.
It’s one thing to want to dress up like a celebrity but to mimic their online behavior could prove to be detrimental to a person’s career for the long-term. It’s bad enough that services like Twitter allow us to be instantly emotional. After the panel concluded, a few attendees mentioned that people they know have shared content online which they thought was private only to learn that other people shared the content outside.
This is the difference between celebrity and celebrity – you can’t get away with it.







i sure hope we do not see more celebs on our social networks!
Allen,
Thanks for being on this NYC ENT week panel! Glad to have you input into the week.
Yeap, celebrities use social networks a lot..I wonder how they have so much spare time..
The problem lies in people misusing the social tools for personal benefits. A hammer can be used to kill somebody or to build a house. Twitter and other tools were not build to make anybody a celebrity, instead, they were built to get people closer to one another, share more, and build stronger networks.