<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SXSW 2009: Mobile Trends Toward Futurism, Commerce, Laziness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/sxsw-mobile-trends/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/sxsw-mobile-trends</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:50:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dean Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/sxsw-mobile-trends/comment-page-#comment-21849</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-21849</guid>
		<description>Image recognition is a &#039;solution&#039; looking for a &#039;problem&#039; where this is none.

The only people i see running around suggesting this is a better method is Image Recognition Vendors and &#039;Artistic Directors&#039; who think QR codes are ugly and wont deign to put them into their glossy magazine (someone needs to take that art director out to the woodshed and tell him that his role is to sell magazines and not make &#039;art&#039;).

QR codes (and other 2d codes) have a clearly defined and understood interaction process.

Image recognition requires an always on internet and third party servers being available (eg. you are caught in their trap forever).

Realistically there&#039;s no need for it, go solve world peace or something useful as Denso solved 2d bar code problem over 14 years ago.

Cheers,
Dean Collins
www.Cognation.net/qr



(BTW would have posted at adrants....but the comments are broken)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Image recognition is a &#8217;solution&#8217; looking for a &#8216;problem&#8217; where this is none.</p>
<p>The only people i see running around suggesting this is a better method is Image Recognition Vendors and &#8216;Artistic Directors&#8217; who think QR codes are ugly and wont deign to put them into their glossy magazine (someone needs to take that art director out to the woodshed and tell him that his role is to sell magazines and not make &#8216;art&#8217;).</p>
<p>QR codes (and other 2d codes) have a clearly defined and understood interaction process.</p>
<p>Image recognition requires an always on internet and third party servers being available (eg. you are caught in their trap forever).</p>
<p>Realistically there&#8217;s no need for it, go solve world peace or something useful as Denso solved 2d bar code problem over 14 years ago.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dean Collins<br />
<a href="http://www.Cognation.net/qr" rel="nofollow">http://www.Cognation.net/qr</a></p>
<p>(BTW would have posted at adrants&#8230;.but the comments are broken)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
