<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CenterNetworks &#187; RefSeek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/tag/refseek/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:00:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Academic Search Engine RefSeek Launches to Help Students and Researchers</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/refseek-search-engine</link>
		<comments>http://www.centernetworks.com/refseek-search-engine#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allen Stern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[human search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RefSeek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
<a href="http://www.refseek.com"><img border="0" align="left" width="200" src="http://static.centernetworks.com/refseekleft.png" alt="refseek" height="70" />RefSeek</a> is a new NY-based search engine that's targeting students and researchers. The company describes themselves as, &#34;RefSeek.com searches the entire Web for freely available academic information, providing relevant results while filtering out most commercial content.&#34;
</p>
<p>
Their demo shows the difference between results on Google and RefSeek for the term &#34;flowers&#34;. On Google you get florists in the results, on RefSeek you get plant sciences listings. 
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://mashable.com/2008/11/11/refseek-search">Stan Schroeder wonders</a> if there's a real reason to switch to RefSeek from Google. Stan notes, &#34;Unfortunately for RefSeek, once you start thinking from a scientist, student, or a researcher’s standpoint, Google - surprisingly - doesn’t fare all that bad.&#34;
</p>
<p>
From my perspective, RefSeek would work well if they went with the Hakia model. Offer a very strong human-powered directory along with search when needed. Make it so the directory answers about 80% of the needs of their target market and let the search handle the other 20%.
</p>
<p align="center">
<img border="0" width="400" src="http://static.centernetworks.com/refseek1.png" height="331" />
</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.centernetworks.com%2Frefseek-search-engine"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.centernetworks.com%2Frefseek-search-engine&amp;source=allenstern&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>
<a href="http://www.refseek.com"><img border="0" align="left" width="200" src="http://static.centernetworks.com/refseekleft.png" alt="refseek" height="70" />RefSeek</a> is a new NY-based search engine that&#8217;s targeting students and researchers. The company describes themselves as, &quot;RefSeek.com searches the entire Web for freely available academic information, providing relevant results while filtering out most commercial content.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Their demo shows the difference between results on Google and RefSeek for the term &quot;flowers&quot;. On Google you get florists in the results, on RefSeek you get plant sciences listings. 
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://mashable.com/2008/11/11/refseek-search">Stan Schroeder wonders</a> if there&#8217;s a real reason to switch to RefSeek from Google. Stan notes, &quot;Unfortunately for RefSeek, once you start thinking from a scientist, student, or a researcher’s standpoint, Google &#8211; surprisingly &#8211; doesn’t fare all that bad.&quot;
</p>
<p>
From my perspective, RefSeek would work well if they went with the Hakia model. Offer a very strong human-powered directory along with search when needed. Make it so the directory answers about 80% of the needs of their target market and let the search handle the other 20%.
</p>
<p align="center">
<img border="0" width="400" src="http://static.centernetworks.com/refseek1.png" height="331" /></p>
<br /><p>Find more stories about: <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/tag/human-search" rel="tag">human search</a>, <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/tag/nyc" rel="tag">NYC</a>, <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/tag/quick-news" rel="tag">Quick News</a>, <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/tag/refseek" rel="tag">RefSeek</a>, <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/tag/search" rel="tag">search</a></p>This story posted on CenterNetworks.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centernetworks.com/refseek-search-engine/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 420/432 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.centernetworks.com @ 2012-02-12 17:43:57 -->
