<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CenterNetworks &#187; Social News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/tag/social-news/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:54:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Blogged Creates a News Portal; Basically a Human Version of Blogrunner</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/blogged-human-blog-directory</link>
		<comments>http://www.centernetworks.com/blogged-human-blog-directory#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allen Stern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechMeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
<img border="0" align="left" width="200" src="http://www.centernetworks.com/images/1/bloggedleft.png" alt="Blogged" height="80" />We initially <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/blogged-human-blog-directory">reviewed blog directory</a> <a href="http://www.blogged.com">Blogged</a> earlier this year. It's a human curated blog directory that provides a (somewhat bogus) score for each blog. Today Blogged is back with their launch of a news portal site. Blogged editors will pull breaking news and the most compelling stories from their content categories (technology, entertainment, sports, etc.) and then displays the stories on the frontpage. 
</p>
<p>
Here is how Blogged compares itself to the other news sites like <a href="http://news.google.com">Google News</a> and <a href="http://news.yahoo.com">Yahoo News</a> along with the &#34;meme trackers&#34; like <a href="http://www.techmeme.com">TechMeme</a>: 
</p>
<blockquote>
	Google News and Yahoo News feature top stories from traditional news sources using a combination of technology and human editors. Memetrackers such as Techmeme and Blogrunner use algorithms to identify and present related stories as told by cliques of bloggers related to a particular industry. User-generated news communities such as Mixx, Digg, and Reddit showcase popular stories daily from across the Web as saved and voted on by individuals. Blogged.com is the only community that features the top qualified stories, representing all popular topics, organized by categories from around the blogosphere, combined with a full informational directory that includes rankings, reviews and recommended reading for each blog. 
</blockquote>
<p>
Today's launch by Blogged seems very similar to what <a href="http://www.blogrunner.com">Blogrunner</a> offers except that it's human curated versus machine-driven. From a gathering the news standpoint, it's basically like Mahalo. Both Mahalo and Blogrunner create tag pages, Mahalo uses their staff and volunteers to find links, Blogrunner uses computers to find the links. Blogged seems to be more in the Mahalo style but without the tag pages. 
</p>
<p>
I don't know how large the Blogged team is, but my only question is whether they be able to stay on top of all of the breaking news across so many categories and be able to bubble up the news in (near) real-time? If so, awesome. Also, I hope they will provide diversity in the blogs that they pimp. 
</p>
<p>
They should add a social layer on top of the news - since they know a lot about each blog, there's a wealth of information they could layer on top of the news and create a community effect on top of the news. 
</p>
<p>
Everyone consumes news in different ways and the one-page category portal-style overveiew should work well for a mainstream audience. 
</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<img border="0" align="left" width="200" src="http://www.centernetworks.com/images/1/bloggedleft.png" alt="Blogged" height="80" />We initially <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/blogged-human-blog-directory">reviewed blog directory</a> <a href="http://www.blogged.com">Blogged</a> earlier this year. It&#8217;s a human curated blog directory that provides a (somewhat bogus) score for each blog. Today Blogged is back with their launch of a news portal site. Blogged editors will pull breaking news and the most compelling stories from their content categories (technology, entertainment, sports, etc.) and then displays the stories on the frontpage.
</p>
<p>
Here is how Blogged compares itself to the other news sites like <a href="http://news.google.com">Google News</a> and <a href="http://news.yahoo.com">Yahoo News</a> along with the &quot;meme trackers&quot; like <a href="http://www.techmeme.com">TechMeme</a>:
</p>
<blockquote><p>
	Google News and Yahoo News feature top stories from traditional news sources using a combination of technology and human editors. Memetrackers such as Techmeme and Blogrunner use algorithms to identify and present related stories as told by cliques of bloggers related to a particular industry. User-generated news communities such as Mixx, Digg, and Reddit showcase popular stories daily from across the Web as saved and voted on by individuals. Blogged.com is the only community that features the top qualified stories, representing all popular topics, organized by categories from around the blogosphere, combined with a full informational directory that includes rankings, reviews and recommended reading for each blog.
</p></blockquote>
<p>
Today&#8217;s launch by Blogged seems very similar to what <a href="http://www.blogrunner.com">Blogrunner</a> offers except that it&#8217;s human curated versus machine-driven. From a gathering the news standpoint, it&#8217;s basically like Mahalo. Both Mahalo and Blogrunner create tag pages, Mahalo uses their staff and volunteers to find links, Blogrunner uses computers to find the links. Blogged seems to be more in the Mahalo style but without the tag pages.
</p>
<p>
I don&#8217;t know how large the Blogged team is, but my only question is whether they be able to stay on top of all of the breaking news across so many categories and be able to bubble up the news in (near) real-time? If so, awesome. Also, I hope they will provide diversity in the blogs that they pimp.
</p>
<p>
They should add a social layer on top of the news &#8211; since they know a lot about each blog, there&#8217;s a wealth of information they could layer on top of the news and create a community effect on top of the news.
</p>
<p>
Everyone consumes news in different ways and the one-page category portal-style overveiew should work well for a mainstream audience.</p>
<br /><strong>CenterNetworks Partner:</strong> Check out <a href="http://www.cloudcontacts.com">CloudContacts</a> for your <a href="http://www.cloudcontacts.com">business card</a> transcription and scanning needs.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centernetworks.com/blogged-human-blog-directory/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Chances Of Not Getting On Digg&#8217;s Frontpage Today: 98.88%</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/digg-frontpage-chance</link>
		<comments>http://www.centernetworks.com/digg-frontpage-chance#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allen Stern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
<a href="http://www.digg.com"><img border="0" align="left" width="100" src="http://www.centernetworks.com/images/sites/diggsmlogo.jpg" alt="Digg" height="55" style="padding: 20px" /></a> Last night during the first <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/digg-town-hall-recap">Digg Townhall</a>, we learned that there are an average of 10,000 stories submitted to Digg daily. I pulled out a scratchpad today and while my numbers might vary a bit from you home gamers, the data is very interesting indeed. 
</p>
<p>
Based on the math in my original article about which <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/what-categories-hit-digg-frontpage">categories hit Digg the most</a> along with <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_mainstream_narrow_news_sources.php">Richard MacManus' post</a> about which sites hit Digg the most in the tech category along with additional research outside of the tech category, here are my findings. Approximately 150 stories make Digg's frontpage per day, not including stories that make it but are subsquently buried. 
</p>
<p>
On an average weekday, you have a 150 in 10,000 chance that your submission will hit the frontpage. However we need to remove a piece of your chance because we know that some sites (in Tech for example: Gizmodo, Engadget, NYT, Techcrunch, Lifehacker, Ars Technica) will get more than one a day on average. Using the completed research and MacManus' figures, I peg these special sites at 25% of the daily average which leaves the rest of us with the balance 112 out of 10,000 chance. I am being very conservative here with the power sites, the number is probably a bit higher. 
</p>
<p>
<strong class="highlight" class="highlight">When we pull out the HP 10B with these revised figures, your chance is now 1.12%; or in other words, a 98% chance you won't make the Digg frontpage today.</strong> 
</p>
<p>
If these percentages continue to get worse for the average site or average Digg user to see a benefit, will there be a slow exit out of the service? Why should a Digg'er push and push if the chances are slim to none that a story will make it? Would it make more sense to target Reddit or Mixx where there are more chances to get at least some bit of traffic? 
</p>
<p>
<strong>My suggestion for Digg is to create separate verticals which would allow 150 stories in each category to hit the frontpage of that vertical each day.</strong> For example, I have no interest in Politics so why do I need to see it? I know that I can turn it off but it still counts into the stories that make the frontpage. These verticals (subdomains perhaps) could allow Digg to once again embrace the community and actually grow their userbase. 
</p>
<p>
For all of the startups who bank on Digg for growth (you know who you are), this should be yet another wakeup call that no blog or social news site alone can make or break your product or service. 
</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<a href="http://www.digg.com"><img border="0" align="left" width="100" src="http://www.centernetworks.com/images/sites/diggsmlogo.jpg" alt="Digg" height="55" style="padding: 20px" /></a> Last night during the first <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/digg-town-hall-recap">Digg Townhall</a>, we learned that there are an average of 10,000 stories submitted to Digg daily. I pulled out a scratchpad today and while my numbers might vary a bit from you home gamers, the data is very interesting indeed.
</p>
<p>
Based on the math in my original article about which <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/what-categories-hit-digg-frontpage">categories hit Digg the most</a> along with <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_mainstream_narrow_news_sources.php">Richard MacManus&#8217; post</a> about which sites hit Digg the most in the tech category along with additional research outside of the tech category, here are my findings. Approximately 150 stories make Digg&#8217;s frontpage per day, not including stories that make it but are subsquently buried.
</p>
<p>
On an average weekday, you have a 150 in 10,000 chance that your submission will hit the frontpage. However we need to remove a piece of your chance because we know that some sites (in Tech for example: Gizmodo, Engadget, NYT, Techcrunch, Lifehacker, Ars Technica) will get more than one a day on average. Using the completed research and MacManus&#8217; figures, I peg these special sites at 25% of the daily average which leaves the rest of us with the balance 112 out of 10,000 chance. I am being very conservative here with the power sites, the number is probably a bit higher.
</p>
<p>
<strong class="highlight">When we pull out the HP 10B with these revised figures, your chance is now 1.12%; or in other words, a 98% chance you won&#8217;t make the Digg frontpage today.</strong>
</p>
<p>
If these percentages continue to get worse for the average site or average Digg user to see a benefit, will there be a slow exit out of the service? Why should a Digg&#8217;er push and push if the chances are slim to none that a story will make it? Would it make more sense to target Reddit or Mixx where there are more chances to get at least some bit of traffic?
</p>
<p>
<strong>My suggestion for Digg is to create separate verticals which would allow 150 stories in each category to hit the frontpage of that vertical each day.</strong> For example, I have no interest in Politics so why do I need to see it? I know that I can turn it off but it still counts into the stories that make the frontpage. These verticals (subdomains perhaps) could allow Digg to once again embrace the community and actually grow their userbase.
</p>
<p>
For all of the startups who bank on Digg for growth (you know who you are), this should be yet another wakeup call that no blog or social news site alone can make or break your product or service.
</p>
<p>
<em>note: not all categories have the same weighting for frontpage status and power digg submitters can up your chance by a small percentage.</em></p>
<br /><strong>CenterNetworks Partner:</strong> Check out <a href="http://www.cloudcontacts.com">CloudContacts</a> for your <a href="http://www.cloudcontacts.com">business card</a> transcription and scanning needs.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centernetworks.com/digg-frontpage-chance/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
