<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Hasn&#8217;t Stolen The Conversation and Why The Money Is In the Conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/the-conversation-monetization/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/the-conversation-monetization</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:50:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Louis Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/the-conversation-monetization/comment-page-#comment-17824</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17824</guid>
		<description>One of the major points I was trying to drive home is that we, as bloggers, need to accept the fact that there are parallel conversations going on constantly. Rather than stick to the old metrics of page views, unique visitors, and total comments, we should instead engage and move to these new sites - FriendFeed, Shyftr, Plaxo, LinkRiver, AssetBar, RSSMeme, ReadBurner, Mergelab, Social&#124;Media, BlogRize... you name it. They are becoming increasingly important in how I acquire, aggregate, share and participate with new data, peers and conversations.

If we do as you say above, and force the conversation to start at A, and migrate outward to B,C, and D, all you will do is push out a very small number of comments. We need to be open to B, C and D pointing back to A, and know that&#039;s where we&#039;re headed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the major points I was trying to drive home is that we, as bloggers, need to accept the fact that there are parallel conversations going on constantly. Rather than stick to the old metrics of page views, unique visitors, and total comments, we should instead engage and move to these new sites &#8211; FriendFeed, Shyftr, Plaxo, LinkRiver, AssetBar, RSSMeme, ReadBurner, Mergelab, Social|Media, BlogRize&#8230; you name it. They are becoming increasingly important in how I acquire, aggregate, share and participate with new data, peers and conversations.</p>
<p>If we do as you say above, and force the conversation to start at A, and migrate outward to B,C, and D, all you will do is push out a very small number of comments. We need to be open to B, C and D pointing back to A, and know that&#8217;s where we&#8217;re headed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeremyB</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/the-conversation-monetization/comment-page-#comment-18147</link>
		<dc:creator>JeremyB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18147</guid>
		<description>Hope you&#039;re well, Allan. 

Let&#039;s assume for the moment that the genie is out of the bottle, and your dream of a world where the conversation takes place exclusively on the site of the original content creator is dead. Would even want a service like the one being described in the comments above, where all the comments on your content from around the Web get fed into your site&#039;s comments? I&#039;m not so sure.

In today&#039;s reality, one of the things that sets the original content creators&#039; (OCC) sites apart is that the people leaving comments tend to be more respectful, more thoughtful, and more knowledgeable about the issues at hand than the universe of people leaving comments at the sites you describe. It&#039;s part of what allows the OCC to deliver more signal than noise.

Of course you&#039;re right about why virtually all aggregators are enabling comments: comments make a site stickier, and stickier sites make more money. Period.

As for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brijit.com&quot;&gt;Brijit&lt;/a&gt;,  we think the fact that we&#039;re creating our own professional, original content sets us above this particular fray.

Best,
Jeremy Brosowsky
founder, Brijit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope you&#8217;re well, Allan. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume for the moment that the genie is out of the bottle, and your dream of a world where the conversation takes place exclusively on the site of the original content creator is dead. Would even want a service like the one being described in the comments above, where all the comments on your content from around the Web get fed into your site&#8217;s comments? I&#8217;m not so sure.</p>
<p>In today&#8217;s reality, one of the things that sets the original content creators&#8217; (OCC) sites apart is that the people leaving comments tend to be more respectful, more thoughtful, and more knowledgeable about the issues at hand than the universe of people leaving comments at the sites you describe. It&#8217;s part of what allows the OCC to deliver more signal than noise.</p>
<p>Of course you&#8217;re right about why virtually all aggregators are enabling comments: comments make a site stickier, and stickier sites make more money. Period.</p>
<p>As for <a href="http://www.brijit.com">Brijit</a>,  we think the fact that we&#8217;re creating our own professional, original content sets us above this particular fray.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Jeremy Brosowsky<br />
founder, Brijit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodi Church-Wagner</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/the-conversation-monetization/comment-page-#comment-18531</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodi Church-Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18531</guid>
		<description>obviously, as a social bookmarking site, we offer a place for our users to collect, share, and comment on their favorite sites. the commenting is new, so i am looking forward to see where it will go. i don&#039;t think this is such a bad thing. i get what you mean though. i don&#039;t see how it would be possible for most sites. at least with social bookmarking, anyway. someone might save a link for pepsi and others might comment, but where should these comments return to? that people are having conversations like they are is already quite a big step. things will evolve in time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>obviously, as a social bookmarking site, we offer a place for our users to collect, share, and comment on their favorite sites. the commenting is new, so i am looking forward to see where it will go. i don&#8217;t think this is such a bad thing. i get what you mean though. i don&#8217;t see how it would be possible for most sites. at least with social bookmarking, anyway. someone might save a link for pepsi and others might comment, but where should these comments return to? that people are having conversations like they are is already quite a big step. things will evolve in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/the-conversation-monetization/comment-page-#comment-18532</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18532</guid>
		<description>I think there is room for a service that grabs all that conversation and pulls it back to the source. Fairly easy to do I reacon. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is room for a service that grabs all that conversation and pulls it back to the source. Fairly easy to do I reacon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/the-conversation-monetization/comment-page-#comment-18535</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18535</guid>
		<description>I hadn&#039;t been following this issue - very enlightening.  Will watch how I post.  Content should be credited.  Bottom line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t been following this issue &#8211; very enlightening.  Will watch how I post.  Content should be credited.  Bottom line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shytalk</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/the-conversation-monetization/comment-page-#comment-18536</link>
		<dc:creator>shytalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18536</guid>
		<description>and the twitter conversation brought me to the source.
Digg,reddit and the others drive traffic to your site,
who doesn&#039;t want a story on the front page of Digg?  
and surely that is the point, it doesn&#039;t really matter
where the conversation takes place as long as it drives
readers to your content. 
except for Shyftr which  actually steal your content and 
doesn&#039;t give you any page views which is wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and the twitter conversation brought me to the source.<br />
Digg,reddit and the others drive traffic to your site,<br />
who doesn&#8217;t want a story on the front page of Digg?<br />
and surely that is the point, it doesn&#8217;t really matter<br />
where the conversation takes place as long as it drives<br />
readers to your content.<br />
except for Shyftr which  actually steal your content and<br />
doesn&#8217;t give you any page views which is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Hodson</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/the-conversation-monetization/comment-page-#comment-18593</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Hodson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18593</guid>
		<description>as for the point about comments being returned to the post of origin I know that Disqus is working hard with FriendFeed to make this happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as for the point about comments being returned to the post of origin I know that Disqus is working hard with FriendFeed to make this happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/the-conversation-monetization/comment-page-#comment-18632</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18632</guid>
		<description>Allen,

I&#039;m sure there&#039;s a startup somewhere coming up with a platform/service that will aggregate comments from a variety of sources - just wait patiently for it!

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allen,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a startup somewhere coming up with a platform/service that will aggregate comments from a variety of sources &#8211; just wait patiently for it!</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan...</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/the-conversation-monetization/comment-page-#comment-18633</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18633</guid>
		<description>there is a tech solution for this...vacuuming disparate conversations back to the source...query whether any aggregator will try objecting to such a service.  Disqus is a natural for this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is a tech solution for this&#8230;vacuuming disparate conversations back to the source&#8230;query whether any aggregator will try objecting to such a service.  Disqus is a natural for this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: centernetworks</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/the-conversation-monetization/comment-page-#comment-18634</link>
		<dc:creator>centernetworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18634</guid>
		<description>thats not what i want - i want the conversation to take place on the source and then it can be exported outside -- not the other way around.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats not what i want &#8211; i want the conversation to take place on the source and then it can be exported outside &#8212; not the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/the-conversation-monetization/comment-page-#comment-18639</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18639</guid>
		<description>That is never going to happen unless there is some sort of open format for comments. Plus how would digg know if the site posted has comments or evening have a place for comments. 


lets face it these guys want the discussion and its a community thing. Its no different to how forums have worked for years. Someone posts a story in a forum and the forum users discuss it. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is never going to happen unless there is some sort of open format for comments. Plus how would digg know if the site posted has comments or evening have a place for comments. </p>
<p>lets face it these guys want the discussion and its a community thing. Its no different to how forums have worked for years. Someone posts a story in a forum and the forum users discuss it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
