Implications Of How A VC Is Funded: Family Office

Editor’s note: NYC Venture Capitalist Mark Davis is authoring a four-part series on how a VC is funded. Davis notes the four methods are: diverse limited partners, family office, government or public capital. Today, Davis looks at the family office. The other three methods will follow throughout the week. Grab the feed to be immediately notified.

In my post, How A VC Is Funded, I listed four way in which VCs obtain capital to invest in startups. Each of these four sources of capital has slightly different implications for entrepreneurs. In this post, I will discuss the implications of a family office funded VC.

By family office I am referring to one family’s private capital. In this scenario the VC firm is essentially working for a very wealthy family to enhance the family’s personal endowment.

Capital Constraints
Some of these VC funds can have a relatively limited amount of capital under management. Since they typically don’t raise capital from third parties, they can only invest what the family allocated to them. Furthermore, once that’s invested they have to wait for a company to be sold in order to have access to more capital.

One risk in this situation is that if the fund has invested a large proportion of their assets under management they may not have the resources to continue to support your company in future rounds. The takeaway is that you should take a look at their balance sheets before accepting an investment.

At The Mercy Of The Family
There is some risk that families may be able to pull their capital out of the fund if they have a sudden need for liquidity. The impact of this would again be an inability of the fund to support you in future rounds.

This is a question worth asking the VCs – they may or may not have protective provisions in their contract with the family that prevent sudden withdrawals.

Even-Keeled Investing Strategy
The psychology and objectives of a VC at a fund with fragmented LPs typically changes through the stages of their investment cycle; they are willing to take more risks at different points in the fund. While this is may be a pro and a con for the entrepreneur, it differs from the styles of family office VCs.

Family office VCs with pools of capital that far exceed their investment capacity are more likely to have a consistent risk tolerance, making for more predictable investment decision making. However, funds with more limited AUM may become more risk adverse as capital pools continue to become increasingly constrained.

Board Accessibility
VCs that have a fragmented LP base become very busy every 3 to 5 years as they go out to raise capital from their LPs. This can make them less accessible to their portfolio companies. However, the best ones make sure that they are still available.

Family office VCs don’t have to spend lots of time raising money, meaning that should be slightly more consistently available to their entrepreneurs.

This column was provided by Mark Davis, the author of Get Venture, a column designed to help entrepreneurs raise venture capital. In addition to his column, Mark is active in the venture community as an entrepreneur, advisor and venture capitalist. He currently works at DFJ Gotham Ventures, a leading early-stage IT venture capital fund based in NYC. Mark is pursuing his MBA at Columbia Business School.