CATEGORIES
- NYC COVERAGE
- WEB STARTUPS
- WEB NEWS
- CONFERENCES
- WEB TECH JOBS
- VENTURE CAPITAL
- MICROSOFT
- INTERVIEWS
- ADVERTISING
- VIDEO
- ALL TOPICS
- ALL COMPANIES
CONTRIBUTORS
- ADRIAN CHAN
- ALICIA NAVARRO
- ALLEN STERN
- CORSIN CAMICHEL
- DRAMA 2.0
- DARREN HERMAN
- HANK WILLIAMS
- MARK DAVIS
- RICK TUROCZY
- SANFORD DICKERT
- SHANNON CLARK
- Comment on YouTube Down by DVS01
- Comment on Twitter COO Costolo: Advertising Coming To Twitter Soon by Satoshi Nakajima
- Comment on Twitter COO Costolo: Advertising Coming To Twitter Soon by OMG Stop the Web! Twitter is gonna run ads ? and Scoble says you?ll love it
- Comment on What?s Up With Yahoo Mail Delivery? by MJ
When ad targeting goes too far – MySpace-VT
This post should give you something to consider as you build your applications. I have seen poor targeting in the past… both on the ad server side and the content serving side, but this might be one of the worst examples to-date.
Online Media Daily is reporting about MySpace displaying "Shoot the rapper, win $5,000" banners on the profiles of those involved in the Virginia Tech tragedy earlier this week. Let's forget the fact that these banners are typically BS in terms that you will need to apply for 105.5 credit cards to get the "5,000". I think the right thing for MySpace to do was immediately after the event (and when the victims were known) to remove all advertisements from the 60 or so students directly involved, either those who are in the hospital or those that lost their lives. Easy change and would have prevented this from happening.
"That's a random network ad that runs throughout out site, and it's not connected contextually because we don't place banner ads contextually on MySpace," said Steven Gold, MySpace CMO.
No matter what type of network it is, contextual or not, it could have easily have been prevented. The same thing on Facebook and all other social sites with profiles. In this case, doing the right thing would have been quicker than doing nothing.
Though on the other side, there does appear to be a lot of online profiting from this event and that is disturbing. Remember that everyone that views the kids profiles on MySpace/news on news sites/videos of the accused are making those sites lots of money. I sure hope that is not their rationale for leaving up the (any) ads. In addition, I am looking forward to seeing traffic numbers on social sites for this month and see how they let us know about where/why the traffic increases came from.







You are right. Shooting a black guy is not amusing when it might remind you of white people being shot. Lets all wait a week before trivialising the murder of black men.
Nowhere did the original story or my post note any race — I have not seen the ads so I don't know if it is a black man, white man, white woman, black woman, etc. I believe the purpose of the original article was to point out that an advertisement showing you shooting someone is not appropriate for a profile of someone who was just shot in the largest mass shooting in U.S. history.
And as I have written loads of times, all of those "win xxx ads" are horrible.