Newest Content
Latest NYC Coverage
NY Web Tech Directory
Most Popular Content
Freshly Baked Jobs
Press Releases
New Interviews
Recent comments
- Re: BricaBox Back From The Dead as Open Source Platform
30 min 43 sec ago - Re: Squarespace Launches v5 of Their Hosted Publishing Platform
33 min 8 sec ago - Re: BricaBox Back From The Dead as Open Source Platform
2 hours 45 min ago - Re: Viddler Vidgets Are Video Widgets
3 hours 31 min ago - Re: Scour Social Search Combines Results and Pays You Cash Money
3 hours 50 min ago
When is it appropriate to remove a comment?
As I do more interviews and discuss the Web with people in my travels, one of the questions that people ask me for advice on is when is the right time to remove a comment. Now I am sure half of you reading this article will say, "Never" and the other half will say, "Anytime you want."
My belief is that there are some limited circumstances where removing a comment is appropriate because everytime you remove a comment that is not one of the below items, your trust level may become questionable. Here are my thoughts:
- Spam - if the person is posting about penis enlargement on a site about iPods, this should be removed
- Illegal activity - duh.
- When a comment is clearly causing a fight not related to the topic
When should a comment not be removed:
- Just cuz.
- When the comment calls out the writer of the article to explain where they came up with some figure/statement
- When the comment calls the writer's integrity into question
I have seen many posts on the "big Web 2.0 boards" which call into question the site owners accountability for the posting. Yet somehow those posts are removed later in the day. But yet, posts that compliment the writer stay. And I do believe that a site owner should/can do whatever they want.
But when you remove posts that contradict what you say, call you out to explain something, then your trust factor declines. And over time, if enough people do not trust you and your posts, they will go elsewhere. Even if you are the biggest today, when your customers (that's what users are btw) question your ethics and trust level, they will eventually leave.
So I call out to the current leaders of the Web 2.0, both product and news sites, think before you remove. Your trust ranking is at stake.











I'd add (although it's arguably part of #2) if the comment is defamatory/libelous and therefore opening you (the blogger and publisher) to litigation.
I'd negotiate with the commenter for a more tempered version of the comment and publish that, if they had left their (real) email. If not, I just wouldn't publish it.
Surely you have comment moderation on?
Unfortunately due to the current threat level, I am not allowed to disclose our comment moderation standings. Please note that we are doing everything we can to keep all spam in comment or trackback from appearing on this site. I won't rest until the spam is gone on the sites I am responsible for.
... it's spam, I'd never remove a comment. I think it's great that people can raise their voice this way.
Or for example. I don't like that when I report an issue somewhere, people fix it up and delete my comment/argument. That's pretty poor. And why then have a blog where people can comment in the first place?
If you are too shy, get a contact form! ;-)
In the end it's probably smart when you reply to all comments you get - the praise and the hate.
Not that you have to engage in a personal discussion, but if you leave everything you show character and present yourself above flames.
Also makes "e-vandalism" almost useless...
I would say anytime that someone goes so far off topic
that it is not productive to the conversation
If you have someone just spewing garbage because they
like to press the submit button then you lock them out
but if someone just says something that respectfully
differs with your opinion then you keep it
and you think about their opinion.
other then that
I would suggest removing any post that I make