<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wrike Launches Enterprise Hosted Project Management Tool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centernetworks.com/wrike-enterprise-project-management/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/wrike-enterprise-project-management</link>
	<description>Web 2 and Social Media News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:27:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/wrike-enterprise-project-management#comment-18599</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18599</guid>
		<description>if their project management tool looks as poor/cluttered/uninviting as their website, i won&#039;t sell this to my clients</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if their project management tool looks as poor/cluttered/uninviting as their website, i won&#8217;t sell this to my clients</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/wrike-enterprise-project-management#comment-18601</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18601</guid>
		<description>As far as I see, Zoho offers a read-only timeline, while Wrike has released the dynamic gantt charts. Tasks can be linked and rescheduled on the chart. That needs to be tested, but I find this Wriks&#039; update very useful. BTW, I find zoho is less flexible than wrike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I see, Zoho offers a read-only timeline, while Wrike has released the dynamic gantt charts. Tasks can be linked and rescheduled on the chart. That needs to be tested, but I find this Wriks&#8217; update very useful. BTW, I find zoho is less flexible than wrike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daria</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/wrike-enterprise-project-management#comment-18606</link>
		<dc:creator>Daria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18606</guid>
		<description>Allen, 
Thank you for your post! Besides the task dependencies feature the new version also includes MS Project integration that will make it easy and painless for MS Project users to transfer to Wrike. 
@ Anonymous 1 - We&#039;re working hard to make Wrike the best project management software. But we realize that there&#039;s always room for improvement. We are open to changes, as soon as they are positive. Could you elaborate on your comment and give us some arguments?
@ Anonymous 2 - Thank you for noticing Wrike&#039;s Dynamic Gantt chart feature. It is one of the features that make Wrike truly unique, our customers love it. Zoho is a good tool, but Wrike is giving your project management flexibility that is indispensible in multi-project environment. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allen,<br />
Thank you for your post! Besides the task dependencies feature the new version also includes MS Project integration that will make it easy and painless for MS Project users to transfer to Wrike.<br />
@ Anonymous 1 &#8211; We&#8217;re working hard to make Wrike the best project management software. But we realize that there&#8217;s always room for improvement. We are open to changes, as soon as they are positive. Could you elaborate on your comment and give us some arguments?<br />
@ Anonymous 2 &#8211; Thank you for noticing Wrike&#8217;s Dynamic Gantt chart feature. It is one of the features that make Wrike truly unique, our customers love it. Zoho is a good tool, but Wrike is giving your project management flexibility that is indispensible in multi-project environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous 1</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/wrike-enterprise-project-management#comment-18608</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18608</guid>
		<description>@ daria - your site currently has too many styles. from round, yellow, green, sharp edges, soft, round. also, i&#039;ve not seen a website in the last year that throws this much text at me on the homepage. I&#039;d need a year to read through all of it. the &quot;key features&quot; on the right looks more like a tagcloud, but nothing really catches attention since everything is overwhelming. &quot;wrike users&quot; gets lost down there, move it up. make it light, easy and friendly. this is cluttered, uninviting and simply too much of everything. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ daria &#8211; your site currently has too many styles. from round, yellow, green, sharp edges, soft, round. also, i&#8217;ve not seen a website in the last year that throws this much text at me on the homepage. I&#8217;d need a year to read through all of it. the &#8220;key features&#8221; on the right looks more like a tagcloud, but nothing really catches attention since everything is overwhelming. &#8220;wrike users&#8221; gets lost down there, move it up. make it light, easy and friendly. this is cluttered, uninviting and simply too much of everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous 1</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/wrike-enterprise-project-management#comment-18609</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18609</guid>
		<description>forgot to say that the tool looks like a great thing - make your website reflect that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>forgot to say that the tool looks like a great thing &#8211; make your website reflect that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daria</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/wrike-enterprise-project-management#comment-18617</link>
		<dc:creator>Daria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18617</guid>
		<description>@ Anonymous 1 – Thanks for your opinion, we will look into it. By the way, it would be nice to know your name, so that I knew whom I’m thanking :). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Anonymous 1 – Thanks for your opinion, we will look into it. By the way, it would be nice to know your name, so that I knew whom I’m thanking :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive Selly</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/wrike-enterprise-project-management#comment-19179</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive Selly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19179</guid>
		<description>Recently I was evaluating various online project management softwares including Wrike. Although I liked Wrike&#039;s simplicity and flexibility, especially creating tasks via email, I found that there is a scope for improvement, especially in scheduling and nice to know that now it accepts task dependencies as well. Keep it up. Our organization finally settled with 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.celoxis.com&quot;&gt;Celoxis&lt;/a&gt; tool, which has very sophisticated scheduling along with few other impressive features like resource utilization, calendar etc and cost us same as that of Wrike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I was evaluating various online project management softwares including Wrike. Although I liked Wrike&#8217;s simplicity and flexibility, especially creating tasks via email, I found that there is a scope for improvement, especially in scheduling and nice to know that now it accepts task dependencies as well. Keep it up. Our organization finally settled with<br />
<a href="http://www.celoxis.com">Celoxis</a> tool, which has very sophisticated scheduling along with few other impressive features like resource utilization, calendar etc and cost us same as that of Wrike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.centernetworks.com/wrike-enterprise-project-management#comment-21083</link>
		<dc:creator>johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-21083</guid>
		<description>People may think wrike has too many features but it positions itself as an enterprise app. So you can&#039;t really ding them for that. They are what they say they are. Another alternative for those needing something less featured is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myintervals.com&quot;&gt;Intervals&lt;/a&gt;, a time tracking &amp; task management app that also includes middleweight project management functionality. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People may think wrike has too many features but it positions itself as an enterprise app. So you can&#8217;t really ding them for that. They are what they say they are. Another alternative for those needing something less featured is <a href="http://www.myintervals.com">Intervals</a>, a time tracking &#038; task management app that also includes middleweight project management functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 410/411 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.centernetworks.com @ 2012-02-13 00:37:51 -->
